17 Jun '09 01:31>2 edits
Obama is probably getting the U.S.'s stance on this just about right.
It has been interesting to see how, throughout this thread, posters concerned about events in Tehran seem to imply that, because we all dislike candidate A, and candidate B's supporters have taken to the streets, this means that candidate B must be right and must also be better than candidate A. Who is Mir Hossein Mousavi anyway? It seems to me he is a 100% creature of the Iranian establishment. Would he have been allowed to stand by the Guardian Council if he were all that different from President Ahmadinejad?
US President Barack Obama is resisting pressure to side with Iran's opposition as mass protests continue over the nation's disputed presidential poll. In a TV interview Mr Obama said there might not be much difference between the policies of President Ahmadinejad and rival Mir Hossein Mousavi. (BBC) Reveal Hidden Contenthttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/middle_east/8104362.stm
It has been interesting to see how, throughout this thread, posters concerned about events in Tehran seem to imply that, because we all dislike candidate A, and candidate B's supporters have taken to the streets, this means that candidate B must be right and must also be better than candidate A. Who is Mir Hossein Mousavi anyway? It seems to me he is a 100% creature of the Iranian establishment. Would he have been allowed to stand by the Guardian Council if he were all that different from President Ahmadinejad?