Go back
Is Hillary Clinton toast?

Is Hillary Clinton toast?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by finnegan
Naturally [b]you would evaluate a secretary of state on the basis of her appearance, as with any other celebrity dancing for her supper on your silver screen. I can easily imagine that the lifestyle of any politician having to operate across the globe would be very wearing, with issues of time zones, jet lag and the like further increasing the demands ...[text shortened]... as made the right decision and does not care much what people like you think of her appearance.[/b]
She don't look bad at all considering her age. Doesn't hold a candle next to Sara Palen but the age difference is significant. Why would folks have chosen to look at Joe Biden when they could have had Palen. This world is nuts I tell you! NUTS!!!!

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

Originally posted by joe beyser
She don't look bad at all considering her age. Doesn't hold a candle next to Sara Palen but the age difference is significant. Why would folks have chosen to look at Joe Biden when they could have had Palen. This world is nuts I tell you! NUTS!!!!
That may be intended as irony but it is not funny. Again, women should be able to participate in public life without having to endure sexism. Men who are unable to deal with women as adults and equals are more than immature and pathetic, they are a nuisance and need to sort their idiotic notions out.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by finnegan
That may be intended as irony but it is not funny. Again, women should be able to participate in public life without having to endure sexism. Men who are unable to deal with women as adults and equals are more than immature and pathetic, they are a nuisance and need to sort their idiotic notions out.
Many is the professional woman that puts on perfume and makeup and displays a little cleavage. They like getting noticed. Most of em anyway. A lot of em flirt too.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by joe beyser
She don't look bad at all considering her age. Doesn't hold a candle next to Sara Palen but the age difference is significant. Why would folks have chosen to look at Joe Biden when they could have had Palen. This world is nuts I tell you! NUTS!!!!
If you compare her now with what she looked like in 2008, she has experienced marked degradation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by CLL53
If you compare her now with what she looked like in 2008, she has experienced marked degradation.
I know. Both of them.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by joe beyser
I know. Both of them.
You guys should get together over a few beers and talk about ball games sometime. Real men clearly.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by finnegan
You guys should get together over a few beers and talk about ball games sometime. Real men clearly.
Hell, just get on in here and join in the conversation. You don't need to get upset.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by joe beyser
I know. Both of them.
Good one. I didn't consider the sagging boobs aspect, was thinking more about the wear and tear on her facial appearance. I bet she is a sagger too though...

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by joe beyser
Hell, just get on in here and join in the conversation. You don't need to get upset.
I'm not upset. I'm laughing at you. A bit like two adolescents trying to shock. Did one of you just mention boobies? Oh my, what a wag! I laugh and laugh.

Vote Up
Vote Down

In the rare chance that the President is not reelected, he could run again in 2016.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by finnegan
I'm not upset. I'm laughing at you. A bit like two adolescents trying to shock. Did one of you just mention boobies? Oh my, what a wag! I laugh and laugh.
No problem Flanegan. We will be here all week.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by CLL53
Good one. I didn't consider the sagging boobs aspect, was thinking more about the wear and tear on her facial appearance. I bet she is a sagger too though...
That would depend on how much monetary resources they have put toward keeping them up.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by joe beyser
That would depend on how much monetary resources they have put toward keeping them up.
You mean how much taxpayer money got spent for state department "support".

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by CLL53
You mean how much taxpayer money got spent for state department "support".
Probably more than a bra that sepparates and lifts.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

I kinda feel sorry for Hillary. I mean, she put up with Bill's antics all those years and stayed faithful anyway. Then she looses to Barry and still stays faithful to him by doing his dirty work and taking the blame.

What can I say, it's a man's world ladies. Maybe Sarah Palin should start a support group.