1. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    08 Oct '14 04:45
    The Kurds are claiming that the USA is essentially letting Kobani fall to the Islamic State by only doing symbolic bombing and nothing more.

    http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/If-Kobani-falls-Turkey-and-the-US-Will-Have-Blood-on-Their-Hands-20141003-0056.html

    Turkey (an ally of the USA) has always seen the Kurds as a threat. Is Obama allowing that threat to be eliminated?
  2. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    08 Oct '14 13:06
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    The Kurds are claiming that the USA is essentially letting Kobani fall to the Islamic State by only doing symbolic bombing and nothing more.

    http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/If-Kobani-falls-Turkey-and-the-US-Will-Have-Blood-on-Their-Hands-20141003-0056.html

    Turkey (an ally of the USA) has always seen the Kurds as a threat. Is Obama allowing that threat to be eliminated?
    It's human nature to sacrifice the interests of the less powerful to appease the more powerful.
  3. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    08 Oct '14 14:011 edit
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    The Kurds are claiming that the USA is essentially letting Kobani fall to the Islamic State by only doing symbolic bombing and nothing more.

    http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/If-Kobani-falls-Turkey-and-the-US-Will-Have-Blood-on-Their-Hands-20141003-0056.html

    Turkey (an ally of the USA) has always seen the Kurds as a threat. Is Obama allowing that threat to be eliminated?
    The Kurds are the only real ally the US has in that Islamic mess.

    Obama is seeing to it that they disappear.

    The Kurds will be left to die like the Christians in the Sudan. Those that are powerless, weak, and not politically connected will be eliminated.
  4. Joined
    05 Sep '08
    Moves
    66636
    08 Oct '14 14:08
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    The Kurds are claiming that the USA is essentially letting Kobani fall to the Islamic State by only doing symbolic bombing and nothing more.

    http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/If-Kobani-falls-Turkey-and-the-US-Will-Have-Blood-on-Their-Hands-20141003-0056.html

    Turkey (an ally of the USA) has always seen the Kurds as a threat. Is Obama allowing that threat to be eliminated?
    The Kurds aren't really in danger. The beheadings are fake.
  5. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    08 Oct '14 14:13
    Originally posted by quackquack
    The Kurds aren't really in danger. The beheadings are fake.
    Really?

    What about the Twin Towers? Did they not really fall?

    What about the bombings at the Boston Marathon, where they faked as well?

    What about the dude that lopped off the head of and American in the US recently? Was that a fake?

    What about Mohammad himself that lopped off the heads of hundreds of his adversaries? Was this faked as well?

    What about the beheadings in Saudi Arabia that happen pretty much every day? Are they faked?
  6. Joined
    05 Sep '08
    Moves
    66636
    08 Oct '14 14:26
    Originally posted by whodey
    Really?

    What about the Twin Towers? Did they not really fall?

    What about the bombings at the Boston Marathon, where they faked as well?

    What about the dude that lopped off the head of and American in the US recently? Was that a fake?

    What about Mohammad himself that lopped off the heads of hundreds of his adversaries? Was this faked as well?

    What about the beheadings in Saudi Arabia that happen pretty much every day? Are they faked?
    I don't believe any of it was faked. But I was hoping to understand from Metal Brain who seems to believe that beheadings were faked why this danger too isn't faked.
  7. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    08 Oct '14 14:44
    The Kurds are not a US ally, so how could the Obama administration "betray" them?
  8. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    08 Oct '14 16:56
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    The Kurds are not a US ally, so how could the Obama administration "betray" them?
    Obama helped them to fight the IS in Iraq when it suited his purpose there. Now in Syria they are left out to dry. Shouldn't they feel used?
  9. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    08 Oct '14 18:541 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  10. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    08 Oct '14 20:56
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    The Kurds are claiming that the USA is essentially letting Kobani fall to the Islamic State by only doing symbolic bombing and nothing more.

    http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/If-Kobani-falls-Turkey-and-the-US-Will-Have-Blood-on-Their-Hands-20141003-0056.html

    Turkey (an ally of the USA) has always seen the Kurds as a threat. Is Obama allowing that threat to be eliminated?
    Obama is all for the Jihadists, which means he is against the Kurds. This is why he allowed US built tanks to fall into their hands and has done nothing to destroy those tanks.
  11. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    08 Oct '14 21:30
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Obama is all for the Jihadists, which means he is against the Kurds. This is why he allowed US built tanks to fall into their hands and has done nothing to destroy those tanks.
    I don't think they do have American made tanks. I think journalists are manipulating headlines to make us think so. When I investigate the only tanks ISIS appear to have are Russian T55s.

    They have American made Humvees.
  12. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    08 Oct '14 21:41
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    I don't think they do have American made tanks. I think journalists are manipulating headlines to make us think so. When I investigate the only tanks ISIS appear to have are Russian T55s.

    They have American made Humvees.
    No matter what tanks they have, we should be able to destroy them easy enough.
  13. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    09 Oct '14 00:16
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Obama is all for the Jihadists, which means he is against the Kurds. This is why he allowed US built tanks to fall into their hands and has done nothing to destroy those tanks.
    I am sure they did get weapons from the US indirectly and Saudi Arabia too. Somebody with deep pockets had to have armed them for them to take as much territory as they did. I am willing to consider the possibility that the USA is fine with what IS is doing and helping certain factions of IS more than others.

    The Obama plan might be to let IS advance and then claim they need US ground troops to stop the advance when it is really to occupy and hold it. It does seems ridiculous that the air strikes can't take out most of those tanks.

    It is obvious to me that US ground troops are part of the plan no matter how much Obama denies it.
  14. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    09 Oct '14 00:24
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    You are right. Everyone in the area is anti Kurd, except when they are looking for an ally against another neighbor. The Kurds therefor don't trust anyone, least of all the US.
  15. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    09 Oct '14 01:49
    Originally posted by Eladar
    No matter what tanks they have, we should be able to destroy them easy enough.
    ISIS has a handful of T72s too but still Russian tanks. They do have American artillery though.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree