http://www.globalclimatescam.com/
"We can only hope that the world leaders will do nothing more than enjoy a pleasant bicycle ride around the charming streets of Copenhagen come December. For if they actually manage to wring out an agreement based on the current draft text of the Coipenhagen climate change treaty, the world is in for some nasty surprises. Draft text, you say? If you have not heard about it, that is because none of our otherwise talkative political leaders have bothered to tell us what the drafters have already cobbled together for leaders to consider. And neither have the media. Enter Lord Christopher Monckton. The former advisor to Margret Thatcher gave an address at Bethel University in St. Paul Minnisota, earlier this month that made quite a splash. For the first time, the public heard about the 181 pages, dated Sept 15, that conprise the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change--a rough draft of what could be signed come December. So far there have been more than a million hits on the YouTube post of his address. It deserves millions more because Lord Monckton warns that the aim of the Copenhagan draft treaty is to set up a transnational "government" on a scale the world has never seen before. The "scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention that starts on page 18 contains the provision for the "government". The aim is to give a new as yet unnamed UN body the power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and evnvironemental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty."
Originally posted by whodeySuppose that someone from the "as yet unnamed UN body" decides to tell the US (or any other nation) to do something it just doesn't want to do. That nation will simply not do it. The "as yet unnamed UN body" will then just have to deal with this.
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/
"We can only hope that the world leaders will do nothing more than enjoy a pleasant bicycle ride around the charming streets of Copenhagen come December. For if they actually manage to wring out an agreement based on the current draft text of the Coipenhagen climate change treaty, the world is in for some nasty surprises. mic, tax and evnvironemental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty."
Consider this to be one of the major advantages of living in a nation that has a very BIG state. No one else tells very BIG states what to do.
Originally posted by whodeyWe already have the IMF and the World Bank which have the power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of most nations.
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/
"We can only hope that the world leaders will do nothing more than enjoy a pleasant bicycle ride around the charming streets of Copenhagen come December. For if they actually manage to wring out an agreement based on the current draft text of the Coipenhagen climate change treaty, the world is in for some nasty surprises. ...[text shortened]... mic, tax and evnvironemental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty."
Originally posted by rwingettAnd they should be done away with along with the UN and other risible organizations!
We already have the IMF and the World Bank which have the power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of most nations.
Originally posted by whodeyOMG It's all makes so much sense now!!!!
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/
"We can only hope that the world leaders will do nothing more than enjoy a pleasant bicycle ride around the charming streets of Copenhagen come December. For if they actually manage to wring out an agreement based on the current draft text of the Coipenhagen climate change treaty, the world is in for some nasty surprises. ...[text shortened]... mic, tax and evnvironemental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty."
Thanks for the laugh, whodey.
Originally posted by telerionNow now, sarcasm and its relationship to low wittedness aside, if I were to play the devils advocate on this one, then surely America lost its sovereignty in 1913 when with the passage of some perfectly timed legislation, saw the Federal Reserve and centralised banking take a firm grasp on America's money supply.**
OMG It's all makes so much sense now!!!!
Thanks for the laugh, whodey.
** yes that old hoary chestnut, yet again.
Originally posted by joneschrwell there's nothing like accepting the mark of change with a positive attitude and an open right hand. The upside is that if you get in on the ground floor and move your currency position early, you stand to gain a motza in the change over 😀
Wow, this is as good as the one from the guy claiming Bush signed the approval to have the U.S.. annexed by Mexico along with the formation of the "Amero" currency.
I love these theories.
Originally posted by telerionI thought you might. Actually, my main point of interest is the vote on cap and trade in the US. How is it that the Congress has not even voted on it yet Obama is making international promises anyhow?
OMG It's all makes so much sense now!!!!
Thanks for the laugh, whodey.
Originally posted by kmax87Agreed.
[b]Now now, sarcasm and its relationship to low wittedness aside, if I were to play the devils advocate on this one, then surely America lost its sovereignty in 1913 when with the passage of some perfectly timed legislation, saw the Federal Reserve and centralised banking take a firm grasp on America's money supply.**
Originally posted by whodeySurely even a smattering of historical knowledge would indicate that this is commonplace in matters of international treaties? What is it about this case that makes you think Obama is doing something out of the ordinary.
Actually, my main point of interest is the vote on cap and trade in the US. How is it that the Congress has not even voted on it yet Obama is making international promises anyhow?