Quoted by STANG]:
CHRISTIAN TERRORISM – THE WRATH OF GOD
Killed by God, in one day, for premarital sex (1 Corinthians 10:8)
23,000 dead
Killed, at God's behest, for not giving God his due (Exodus 32:26-28)
3,000 dead
Killed for being counted by David (1 Chronicles 21:1-14)
70,000 dead
Killed by God for questioning Moses and Aaron (Numbers 16:35)
14,950 dead
Killed by God, in a plague, for whoring around (Numbers 25:1-9)
24,000 dead
Delivered by God to be killed by Israelites (Judges 3:28-29)
30,000 dead
Killed by God for engaging in homosexual acts (Genesis 19:24-25)
Everything dead in 2 cities
Killed by God after their king made fun of him (Isaiah 37:1-36)
185,000 dead
God threatened to kill for abandoning him (Amos 5:1-3)
90 percent of Israel
Killed by God when he was particularly disgusted (Genesis 6:5-7:22)
Everything dead on earth – except a few on an ark
Comply or spend eternity in hell (Rom. 6:23, Rev. 19:ll-15; 20:8) [UNQUOTE]
Chancremechanic: A "bluebird" told me that STANG was banned from the forums for the above posts and his expressions regarding each. While I don't necessarely agree with them due to the context he has used in pointing out how God works, and rarely do I agree with anything that STANG posts. Besides, God giveth, and God taketh away...He doesn't "kill" anybody. That said, may I suggest that in the name of CHRISTmas and in good cheer that he be reinstated back into the forums and RHP?. I know STANG is whacked out, but so am I, and that's what makes these forums interesting...what do you say moderators. If I am wrong in assuming he was banned for this reason, please PM me and inform me as to the real reason, so I don't look like a fool otherwise...thanks
Originally posted by chancremechanicI totally agree with you, whilst I normally disagree with both of you (one on content, the other on method).
Quoted by STANG]:
CHRISTIAN TERRORISM – THE WRATH OF GOD
Killed by God, in one day, for premarital sex (1 Corinthians 10:8)
23,000 dead
Killed, at God's behest, for not giving God his due (Exodus 32:26-28)
3,000 dead
Killed for being counted by David (1 Chronicles 21:1-14)
70,000 dead
Killed by God for questioning Moses and ...[text shortened]... lease PM me and inform me as to the real reason, so I don't look like a fool otherwise...thanks
Let's have Stang back.
I don't much care for being spammed by Stang, but as usual I don't see anything controversial in what he's saying. He's not being any more inflammatory than some of the far-right folk in the forum, and I don't think anyone is calling for them to be banned. The irony is, if Stang was less obsessed with using repetition, we'd probably already be discussing his thread as opposed to his ban, which is what he really wants anyway - for all his self-negating tactics, Stang lacks ego, and he's clearly one of the good guys.
Originally posted by chancremechanicProtesting against STANG by multiple posting? Irony anyone?
Quoted by STANG]:
CHRISTIAN TERRORISM – THE WRATH OF GOD
Killed by God, in one day, for premarital sex (1 Corinthians 10:8)
23,000 dead
Killed, at God's behest, for not giving God his due (Exodus 32:26-28)
3,000 dead
Killed for being counted by David (1 Chronicles 21:1-14)
70,000 dead
Killed by God for questioning Moses and ...[text shortened]... lease PM me and inform me as to the real reason, so I don't look like a fool otherwise...thanks
Originally posted by AmauroteYou may not care about getting spammed by someone, but I certainly do, especially after receiving more unwanted PM messages from him. He has a history of posting spam and not debating the topics he posts on. What he posts is irrelevant to his forum ban. How he posts is what matters. Past behaviour has shown that he doesn't reform after his forum bans. I don't expect his behaviour should change. Therefore, the site mods would be justified in giving him a permanent forum ban.
I don't much care for being spammed by Stang, but as usual I don't see anything controversial in what he's saying...... for all his self-negating tactics, Stang lacks ego, and he's clearly one of the good guys.
Originally posted by AmauroteWhat's your definition of a "good guy"?
I don't much care for being spammed by Stang, but as usual I don't see anything controversial in what he's saying. He's not being any more inflammatory than some of the far-right folk in the forum, and I don't think anyone is calling for them to be banned. The irony is, if Stang was less obsessed with using repetition, we'd probably already be discuss ...[text shortened]... ay - for all his self-negating tactics, Stang lacks ego, and he's clearly one of the good guys.
Originally posted by AmauroteOK, I'll go along with Chuck Norris, as he espouses health and well-being and cares for young people....good choice.....although I was hoping you'd say me 😉
Well, the variables are too complicated to explain, but Chuck Norris in Hellbound would be a classic example.
Originally posted by MRobertsI did, on Christmas eve. This isn't the first time. He sent a similar message to me that last time he was banned.....and the time before that....
Did anyone else get a message from Stang protesting at his ban?
I had asked him to refrain from sending me such messages. I attempted to kindly express to him that I was in agreement with the mods. However, he continues with his PMs to me of this nature.
Further more, I am simply dumbfounded by this last one. Not only does he disrespect my humble and polite request to cease such messages, but he sends me one which directly infers negative connotations toward Christianity......to me.....one of the more outspoken Christians on the site........on Christmas eve.
I still can't decide if I should be profoundly upset or absurdly amused. 🙄😵
