Originally posted by BarnaclesHe doesn't have an opinion on nothing. He also doesn't have arguments to present. All he has are wikipedia links and "witty" one liners.
zeeblebot has an opinion about everything, so it seems, and none of them constructive. What makes a person love to criticise? Is he capable of a positive word?
Ancient Chinese Proverb: opinions are like ass holes, everybody's got one.
Originally posted by zeeblebotand, what kind of positive comments are you looking for? please give us some examples.
Barnacles, are you sure you are not an adam warlock sockpuppet?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungI disagree. 'Constructive' has little relevance with regard to zeeblebot activity. After adequate dosage -- a brazillion hits or more -- one perceives a pattern of inquiry and challenge leavened with the slightest sprinkling of confessional material (in the Rousseau rather than Catholic sense). CS Peirce might say that zeeblebot is a sign (I'll have to check on that once I've adequately digested more CS Peirce).
Zeeb is about 10% constructive. There's a little bit of value in his posts but they are mostly copy-paste spam.
Originally posted by sh76The problem isn't about disagreeing as sh76 or aty serve as a proof. The problem is the utter inanity and lack of content.
Originally posted by adam warlockCorrection Hanging out in the Debate Forum, using software to filter out people who have disagreed with you - and then responding to some of the posts through a third person - is now perhaps the dumbest thing I've come across on RHP.
The problem isn't about disagreeing as sh76 or aty serve as a proof. The problem is the utter inanity and lack of content.
I'm in debates for the debates not to read wikipedia or to reply to windbagged dingbats.
Thanks for letting me see this, sh76 old pal!