1. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    22 Feb '21 19:55
    @earl-of-trumps said
    I am surprised that *democrats* are doing the protecting of people that run over
    BLM-ers and antifas. You do know this is a democrat government now. House,
    Senate, and executive.
    Apparently you didn't read the article.

    Now, Republican politicians across the country are moving to stop the road-blocking maneuver, proposing increased penalties for demonstrators who run onto highways and legal immunity for drivers who hit them. The bills are among dozens introduced in Legislatures aimed at cracking down on demonstrations.
  2. Subscriberkevcvs57
    Flexible
    The wrong side of 60
    Joined
    22 Dec '11
    Moves
    37033
    22 Feb '21 19:56
    @mott-the-hoople said
    its TOO, not to. and you need to adjust word wrap on your browser

    "The link ran off the page and into the tall brass but I assume it’s a self defence thing if you can prove that you had to plough through the mob to save yourself from them."

    but you commented on it knowing what it said...are you lying here?
    I know your really thick but I assumed you and earl would know the meaning and usage of “assumed”
    I must have overestimated your literacy soz.
  3. Subscriberkevcvs57
    Flexible
    The wrong side of 60
    Joined
    22 Dec '11
    Moves
    37033
    22 Feb '21 19:58
    @athousandyoung said
    Apparently you didn't read the article.

    Now, Republican politicians across the country are moving to stop the road-blocking maneuver, proposing increased penalties for demonstrators who run onto highways and legal immunity for drivers who hit them. The bills are among dozens introduced in Legislatures aimed at cracking down on demonstrations.
    Pointless reading a thing if your gonna lie to suit your argument regardless of of what you read.
  4. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    23 Feb '21 02:08
    @Mott-The-Hoople
    The answer to his question of whether you EVER think for yourself was answered by you in that post.
    Ignore, distract, throw red herrings, ANYTHING to make you THINK you have just won an argument. The reality is a lot different.
  5. SubscriberEarl of Trumps
    Pawn Whisperer
    My Kingdom fora Pawn
    Joined
    09 Jan '19
    Moves
    18494
    24 Feb '21 01:081 edit
    @kevcvs57 said
    I know your really thick but I assumed you and earl would know the meaning and usage of “assumed”
    I must have overestimated your literacy soz.
    kevcvs57: "I know your really thick..."

    It's "you're"
  6. Subscriberkevcvs57
    Flexible
    The wrong side of 60
    Joined
    22 Dec '11
    Moves
    37033
    24 Feb '21 13:41
    @earl-of-trumps said
    kevcvs57: "I know your really thick..."

    It's "you're"
    I assume that autocorrect is to blame
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree