Go back
Juillian Assange to be released!

Juillian Assange to be released!

Debates


@Suzianne said
Do you delete emails?

I know I do.

I'm not keeping gigabytes of yesterday's news on my computer.

And neither did Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice.

But you seem okay with them keeping private servers.
not emails under congressional subpoena

PS…you are looking stupid trying to defend clinton


@no1marauder said
"As a condition of his plea, he will be required to destroy classified information provided to WikiLeaks."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-s-plane-leaves-bangkok-on-his-way-to-a-us-court-and-later-freedom/ar-BB1oPJO8?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Not exactly "heroic".

I agree with the NY Times article that calls this a "chilling precedent".
The information is already out there. Are you suggesting putting the crap back into the horse? God that is stupid. Do you think I will forget what was released?


@no1marauder said
"As a condition of his plea, he will be required to destroy classified information provided to WikiLeaks."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-s-plane-leaves-bangkok-on-his-way-to-a-us-court-and-later-freedom/ar-BB1oPJO8?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Not exactly "heroic".

I agree with the NY Times article that calls this a "chilling precedent".
You must be an expert in putting the crap back in the horse. The information is out and it will stay out. It makes no sense.


@no1marauder said
I think he would have been well advised to fight the charges in Federal Court.

I can't think of any journalist successfully prosecuted under the Espionage Act for merely reporting what whistle blowers told them or for publicizing documents given to them by others. Even if convicted, he would have had a good chance of success appealing on First Amendment grounds. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States
So he would get all those years in prison back? Get real.


@Metal-Brain said
The information is already out there. Are you suggesting putting the crap back into the horse? God that is stupid. Do you think I will forget what was released?
Moron, this refers to information Wikileaks might receive in the future.

Gawd, you're an obnoxious, simple minded clown.


@Metal-Brain said
So he would get all those years in prison back? Get real.
No, idiot, he should have fought the charges in court when the Trump DOJ first indicted him. Instead, his legal strategy to waste 5 years in a fruitless battle against extradition led to a long incarceration.


@no1marauder said
No, idiot, he should have fought the charges in court when the Trump DOJ first indicted him. Instead, his legal strategy to waste 5 years in a fruitless battle against extradition led to a long incarceration.
Do you think he has nine lives?

https://www.democracynow.org/2021/9/28/cia_julian_assange_assassination_plot

Trump and his evil CIA man Pompeo wanted him dead.......idiot!
What you are suggesting amounts to suicide. He probably still fears for his life. Being let free may seem a little too easy for comfort to Assange.


@no1marauder said
Moron, this refers to information Wikileaks might receive in the future.

Gawd, you're an obnoxious, simple minded clown.
Why didn't you just say that?
You are the moron.

He would probably do that voluntarily after all he has been through, don't ya think? God you are stupid!


@Metal-Brain said
Do you think he has nine lives?

https://www.democracynow.org/2021/9/28/cia_julian_assange_assassination_plot

Trump and his evil CIA man Pompeo wanted him dead.......idiot!
What you are suggesting amounts to suicide. He probably still fears for his life. Being let free may seem a little too easy for comfort to Assange.
Believing in nutty conspiracy theories has real life consequences to some people, if not to morons like yourself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain said
Why didn't you just say that?
You are the moron.

He would probably do that voluntarily after all he has been through, don't ya think? God you are stupid!
Then he might as well shut down Wikileaks, don't you think?

Unless all he wants it for now is as an arm of the Russian military propaganda machine which is, unfortunately, what he decided to use it for in 2016. Getting information that was classified but of great importance to the People was the raison d'etre of Wikileaks, which he has now promised to forego.


@no1marauder said
Believing in nutty conspiracy theories has real life consequences to some people, if not to morons like yourself.
What conspiracy theory?


@no1marauder said
Then he might as well shut down Wikileaks, don't you think?

Unless all he wants it for now is as an arm of the Russian military propaganda machine which is, unfortunately, what he decided to use it for in 2016. Getting information that was classified but of great importance to the People was the raison d'etre of Wikileaks, which he has now promised to forego.
You were obviously projecting. You are putting forth conspiracy theories, not me.


Julian Assange is an Australian citizen, who owes no loyalty to the American legal system. America has no right to charge a non-citizen journalist with treason because he published the truth.
America wanted him so they could hide him in Guanatamo Bay and/or kill him.
America's much-vaunted right to free speech went down the tubes in a big way.

And then Americans wonder why their allies, not just Australia but all the other supposed "friends", don't trust them.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Kewpie said
Julian Assange is an Australian citizen, who owes no loyalty to the American legal system. America has no right to charge a non-citizen journalist with treason because he published the truth.
America wanted him so they could hide him in Guanatamo Bay and/or kill him.
America's much-vaunted right to free speech went down the tubes in a big way.

And then Americans wonder why their allies, not just Australia but all the other supposed "friends", don't trust them.
Assange wasn't charged with "treason" and his citizenship is irrelevant to the charges he was accused of.


He's a journalist, not what all your media made him out to be. Your First Amendment should have applied to information released in the public interest. That information should have been released.
All he did "wrong" is fail to redact identification details. Oh, and not be a US citizen.

Might does not make right, you know.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.