@averagejoe1 saidKagan wrote this in her dissent, which was about how judges and bureaucrats who are not scientists don't know what they are talking about. That's the whole point. Is the entire East Coast going to be swallowed up like an apocalypse movie, or are we going to keep living in a perfect climate forever? Who knows?
Fair enough, but Kagan wrote this IN HER DISSENT. Thomas' comments are at best hearsay. I win this bout, you have no counter.
I seem to debate better in the evening, I guess.
Climate scientists. Let's not have judges making decisions about our climate future.
@wildgrass saidThat is the point Who knows. Are you daft? No one knows for sure, yet you and Kagan write as though it is a fact.
Kagan wrote this in her dissent, which was about how judges and bureaucrats who are not scientists don't know what they are talking about. That's the whole point. Is the entire East Coast going to be swallowed up like an apocalypse movie, or are we going to keep living in a perfect climate forever? Who knows?
Climate scientists. Let's not have judges making decisions about our climate future.
Whew, like writing in.Netherworld
@averagejoe1 saidWho's more qualified to make that call; an agency of scientists empowered by Congress to identify and regulate air pollutants or a few right wing judges?
That is the point Who knows. Are you daft? No one knows for sure, yet you and Kagan write as though it is a fact.
Whew, like writing in.Netherworld
@no1marauder said........or posters on this Forum. I wonder why Jimmmm thinks abut climate change?
Who's more qualified to make that call; an agency of scientists empowered by Congress to identify and regulate air pollutants or a few right wing judges?