Kavanaugh FROTHING at the mouth

To kill Roe V Wade.

His argument, lets not even VOTE on this, just throw it back on the states, let THEM decide.

They want nothing more than complete control of women's lives.

They also don't care how many women die as the result of back street coathanger abortions.

Or what happens to mom after the birth, they don't care in the SLIGHTEST the woman might die in childbirth.

Or that the pregnancy is the result of incest or rape.

AND when these right to lifers actually win and force the woman to full term, they drop her like a hot potato and go on to the NEXT pyrrhic victory, no matter if the woman is starving, baby dies of starvation, no matter, WE WON and women better fall in line.

@sonhouse said
To kill Roe V Wade.

His argument, lets not even VOTE on this, just throw it back on the states, let THEM decide.

They want nothing more than complete control of women's lives.

They also don't care how many women die as the result of back street coathanger abortions.

Or what happens to mom after the birth, they don't care in the SLIGHTEST the woman might die in ...[text shortened]... if the woman is starving, baby dies of starvation, no matter, WE WON and women better fall in line.

@Mott-The-Hoople
Yeah, you are SUCH an expert on reproduction and reproduction rights.

YOU want total control of women, and don't care WHO you crush doing it.

That is EXACTLY what right to lifers want.
And all your mewling and hand wringing will not change that.

They basically want to turn the US into a Christian califate.

They will never get there but that is what they desire.

Another possibility is that some states will allow abortions and some won't, turning the country into more of a federation of independent states where that issue is concerned.

Maybe we will end up effectively splitting into two countries. But I do undertand that not everyone has the means or the circumstances to just move to a more favorable and compatible state.

On a side note, one of the cases under review only prohibits abortions after four plus months -- why would that not be a reasonable compromise?

Also, Obama and the Democrats trotting out such a patently conniving phrase as "reproductive health" did not help the cause.

@sonhouse said
To kill Roe V Wade.

His argument, lets not even VOTE on this, just throw it back on the states, let THEM decide.

They want nothing more than complete control of women's lives.

They also don't care how many women die as the result of back street coathanger abortions.

Or what happens to mom after the birth, they don't care in the SLIGHTEST the woman might die in ...[text shortened]... if the woman is starving, baby dies of starvation, no matter, WE WON and women better fall in line.

@wildgrass said
If SCOTUS is going to kick it back to the states, I would think it'd need to include a requirement that states banning abortions pay for the cost of pregnancy, no? I have insurance, but we still saw the bills and it was $30,000. For a complicated pregnancy this can be 2-fold higher.

@wildgrass said
If SCOTUS is going to kick it back to the states, I would think it'd need to include a requirement that states banning abortions pay for the cost of pregnancy, no? I have insurance, but we still saw the bills and it was $30,000. For a complicated pregnancy this can be 2-fold higher.

@sonhouse said
@Mott-The-Hoople
Yeah, you are SUCH an expert on reproduction and reproduction rights.

YOU want total control of women, and don't care WHO you crush doing it.

That is EXACTLY what right to lifers want.
And all your mewling and hand wringing will not change that.

They basically want to turn the US into a Christian califate.

They will never get there but that is what they desire.

@mott-the-hoople said
if it makes you feel better to lie about it have at it.

@wildgrass said
If SCOTUS is going to kick it back to the states, I would think it'd need to include a requirement that states banning abortions pay for the cost of pregnancy, no? I have insurance, but we still saw the bills and it was $30,000. For a complicated pregnancy this can be 2-fold higher.

@mott-the-hoople said
we want to quit killing babies, 15 weeks is long enough to make up your mind. Only three nations at present allow termination after 15 weeks...china, n korea ant the US. Nice company you have there.

@mott-the-hoople said
you libs need a requirement to accept the consequences for your actions. pregnancy is not something you catch. It is caused by a deliberate act.

@mott-the-hoople said
you libs need a requirement to accept the consequences for your actions. pregnancy is not something you catch. It is caused by a deliberate act.

@shavixmir said
Only 3 nations?
You are completely deluded.

59 countries allow elective abortions.
7 of these allow it after 20 weeks.

A great many countries allow abortions under certain circumstances (medical, rape, incest, mental health, etc.) after the first trimester (13 weeks).

@shavixmir said
Yeah. Let's chop off men's nuts. No nuts, no abortions. Plain and bloody simple.