Kimmel not fired and returning tomorrow

@wildgrass said
As always this is MAGA. Wanting it both ways. Kimmel is too influential and needs to go, and he's already a nobody.

"Democrats stole this election from me.... And I won fair and square."

"People should follow the laws of this country or be kicked out, except the president he should be immune."

"Waste fraud and corruption should be rooted out of government but if my ...[text shortened]... o implement vaccine requirements, but he can direct the entire agency to close down."

It goes on.

I almost forgot the best one...

"We want a meritocracy where only the best qualified candidate gets the job, and we want a gaggle of inexperienced podcasters making the most important decisions that keep our country safe."

@Cliff-Mashburn said
@chessgirlzzz
I think firing him was a PR stunt by ABC to create a buzz around him and boost his ratings when they brought him back. It'll work for the short term, but he's not funny and his libtard fan base is shrinking.

Attempts by government to censor speech is supposed to backfire like this. We have a fascist government but we are not yet a fascist nation.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
its because the left has learned they can tell lies and their base will believe them.
it looks to me like they would get fed up with being made fools by their handlers.

a liberal is incapable of thinking on their own, they just fall in line with what their handlers say

You're kidding me, right?

This is you trying to flip the script, right?

We ain't buying it and neither is anyone with an IQ bigger than their shoe size.

Trump is just the monkey handler. Whatever he says, whatever he implies, whatever he barfs out of his mouth, the monkeys have been taking it and running with it for years. For years.

Yet now you say it's really democrats who do that stuff.

You mental midgets don't even have the two brain cells necessary to think up something about us all by yourselves. You have to borrow from us the very thing we've been saying about you for years. For years.

@wildgrass said
Be careful or antifa might steal your little brother's lunch money.

Hahahaha!

@wildgrass said
Attempts by government to censor speech is supposed to backfire like this. We have a fascist government but we are not yet a fascist nation.

Like when the Biden admin ordered Twitter and Facebook to remove conservative viewpoints?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/mark-zuckerberg-joe-rogan-biden-officials-scream-curse-facebook-rcna187199

@Cliff-Mashburn said
Like when the Biden admin ordered Twitter and Facebook to remove conservative viewpoints?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/mark-zuckerberg-joe-rogan-biden-officials-scream-curse-facebook-rcna187199

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-tosses-claim-biden-administration-coerced-social-media-c-rcna151356

@wildgrass said
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-tosses-claim-biden-administration-coerced-social-media-c-rcna151356

It was denied a legal technicality, not because it was shown to be untrue;
"The court found on a 6-3 vote that plaintiffs did not have standing to sue, in part because they had failed to adequately allege that the content moderation at issue was as a result of government actions."

@Cliff-Mashburn said
It was denied a legal technicality, not because it was shown to be untrue;
"The court found on a 6-3 vote that plaintiffs did not have standing to sue, in part because they had failed to adequately allege that the content moderation at issue was as a result of government actions."

That's not a "technicality"; that's a rejection of plaintiffs central claim that government action had anything to do with the content moderation. In truth, the Biden administration didn't order FB or other social media to do anything.

@Cliff-Mashburn said
It was denied a legal technicality, not because it was shown to be untrue;
"The court found on a 6-3 vote that plaintiffs did not have standing to sue, in part because they had failed to adequately allege that the content moderation at issue was as a result of government actions."

Umm. That's not a technicality, mate. Read it again.

@no1marauder said
That's not a "technicality"; that's a rejection of plaintiffs central claim that government action had anything to do with the content moderation. In truth, the Biden administration didn't order FB or other social media to do anything.

Ohhh...so all those people that worked in the Biden Administration were just doing it on their own?
Riiiiight.

@no1marauder said
That's not a "technicality"; that's a rejection of plaintiffs central claim that government action had anything to do with the content moderation. In truth, the Biden administration didn't order FB or other social media to do anything.

Hypocrites

https://nypost.com/2020/11/17/jack-dorsey-is-finally-starting-to-admit-twitters-censorship-problem/

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/27/business/mark-zuckerberg-meta-biden-censor-covid-2021

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/google-admits-censorship-pressure-biden-181307766.html

@Mott-The-Hoople said
Hypocrites

https://nypost.com/2020/11/17/jack-dorsey-is-finally-starting-to-admit-twitters-censorship-problem/

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/27/business/mark-zuckerberg-meta-biden-censor-covid-2021

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/google-admits-censorship-pressure-biden-181307766.html

Show me, or better yet the SCOTUS, where the Biden administration directly threatened negative retaliatory regulatory action if FB or anybody else didn't censor content.

You can't but that's exactly what the Trump administration just did.

@no1marauder said
Show me, or better yet the SCOTUS, where the Biden administration directly threatened negative retaliatory regulatory action if FB or anybody else didn't censor content.

You can't but that's exactly what the Trump administration just did.

I just did.

What was Alex Jones crime?

@Cliff-Mashburn said
Ohhh...so all those people that worked in the Biden Administration were just doing it on their own?
Riiiiight.

Government officials have the same right to freedom of speech as anybody else. Carr was free to say ABC should fire Kimmel; but he violated the First Amendment when he threatened governmental action if they didn't punish him for his speech.

Learn the difference.

@no1marauder said
Government officials have the same right to freedom of speech as anybody else. Carr was free to say ABC should fire Kimmel; but he violated the First Amendment when he threatened governmental action if they didn't punish him for his speech.

Learn the difference.

your fantasy world is falling apart. people have grown tired of your lies and hypocrisy

why you ignore what was Alex Jones crime?