3 edits
Originally posted by Saint Nick"Real" is kind of illusory. All of our lost history is "real". Or it is myth.
There is no conclusive evidence either way.
Very likely he was real, but almost impossible to seperate the legends from the person.
In either case. It needs to be examined. See... Joseph Campbell.
Religion?
Do we want to reject it out of hand?
Knowing our need and dependant nature?
Ok.
At your own risk.
Reject OUR myth at your own risk of UNDERSTANDING.
Originally posted by Saint NickMaybe. The winner writes and so on. The loser dies. A million deaths.
You might be ok...
Religion is false but should be kept around to keep everyone sane and productive.
History is always very intersting how it changes with times. Reminds me of the saying about war "the winner writes the history". Very true..
But victory determines the books. The Victors own the presses.
The loosers just... are. A footnote?
Sorry Clause.
Originally posted by StarValleyWyAnd our history has been written by winners.
Maybe. The winner writes and so on. The loser dies. A million deaths.
But victory determines the books. The Victors own the presses.
The loosers just... are. A footnote?
Sorry Clause.
Be very interesting if different people ad won different wars.
A different history with different footnotes, but the facts remain the same.
No one will ever know the truth, but will any of it matter?
Originally posted by Saint NickReality is a bitch.
And our history has been written by winners.
Be very interesting if different people ad won different wars.
A different history with different footnotes, but the facts remain the same.
No one will ever know the truth, but will any of it matter?
Live with it.
Or dream of killing the folk?
Like stalin did?
Murdering bugger?
Or do you support "the people"?
You have not said.
Say.
Originally posted by StarValleyWy"The People"?
Reality is a bitch.
Live with it.
Or dream of killing the folk?
Like stalin did?
Murdering bugger?
Or do you support "the people"?
You have not said.
Say.
That's a dangerous term.
Too many bad things have been done by the people for the people.
How do we save the people from themselves?
Originally posted by Saint NickBy reasoning right from wrong?
"The People"?
That's a dangerous term.
Too many bad things have been done by the people for the people.
How do we save the people from themselves?
ooops.l
Sorry. I fergot. Liberals can't recognize that.
Sorry.
The rest of us can. Lost any good elections lately? Because you couldn't recognize 'good from bad'?
1 edit
Originally posted by StarValleyWyMaybe you forgot your lunchpail and lost your way...
By reasoning right from wrong?
ooops.l
Sorry. I fergot. Liberals can't recognize that.
Sorry.
The rest of us can. Lost any good elections lately? Because you couldn't recognize 'good from bad'?
I'm a right-wing conservative athiest that has won the last two elections.
I can reason right from wrong...it's all those people in San Fransico that I'm worried about.
1 edit
Originally posted by Saint NickSaint...
Maybe you forgot your lunchpail and lost your way...
I'm a right-wing conservative athiest that has won the last two elections.
I can reason right from wrong...it's all those people in San Fransico that I'm worried about.
You are a sick puppy.
Merry Christmas
<edit> don't worry. They are all smarter than you and I. They will be fine. Really.