Originally posted by zeeblebotGet a life.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touched_By_An_Angel
"The series finale shows Monica, who is up for promotion, defending Zack, an innocent drifter accused of blowing up a school full of children. The prosecutor is actually the Devil, played by David Ogden Stiers. Despite Monica's best efforts, Zack is convicted.
Visiting him in the prison, Monica off ...[text shortened]... r someone else." This is a strong and powerful Gospel message. Monica is finally promoted.
"
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauder"get a life" is something "of consequence"? ....
Jerk, if you have nothing of consequence to say on the subject of this thread, stop spamming.
not everything that came down from the founding fathers is golden ...
do defense lawyers try to get the dumbest juries they can?
Originally posted by zeeblebotMy post was in response to your moronic decision to put a synopsis of a "Touched by an Angel" episode in a thread that was supposed to be an intelligent discussion of an issue. And maybe among right-wingers "Geez whiz that would suck" is considered a rational argument, but so far as I can see all you're doing to this thread is spamming.
"get a life" is something "of consequence"? ....
not everything that came down from the founding fathers is golden ...
do defense lawyers try to get the dumbest juries they can?
Originally posted by no1marauderprobably it went over your head ...
My post was in response to your moronic decision to put a synopsis of a "Touched by an Angel" episode in a thread that was supposed to be an intelligent discussion of an issue. And maybe among right-wingers "Geez whiz that would suck" is considered a rational argument, but so far as I can see all you're doing to this thread is spamming.
1 edit
"if you are a lucky defendant, the average juror on your jury will have watched the series finale of Touched by an Angel ....
do defense lawyers try to get the dumbest juries they can?"
ok, having dispensed with the jury system, and (self-evidently) with the proposal to replace it with a panel of jurists, what could we do next?
how about maintaining criminal law in a database, and turning the sentencing phase into a database lookup? and much of the evidentiary phase as well?
cookie cutter justice ... no more of this "i done it cuz my pa beat me when i wuz little" crap ...