Go back
Let us see what she is saying about things....not about Trump

Let us see what she is saying about things....not about Trump

Debates


@mchill said
Tell us one of the differences in those immigrants of yore and the immigrants of today.

Immigrants of yore came here by sea. Immigrants of today came here by land

- So, what's your point Joe?
LoserMcHill tells us how they got here.
I swear that I did not alter his comment, ,he really said that.
Pitiful.


@AverageJoe1 said
LoserMcHill tells us how they got here.
I swear that I did not alter his comment, ,he really said that.
Pitiful.
The main loser around here is you, smaller than average joe boy.


@AverageJoe1 said
An attack on the Electoral College is an attack on the Constitution.
No, it's not. Capping the size of the House in 1929 at 435 members broke the representation in the EC.

If Wyoming with 584k people has 1 rep then New York at 19.6 million should have 34 reps and Texas with 30.5 million should have 52. They don't - they have 26 and 38, respectively.

The EC as they amended it is unfair.


@AverageJoe1 said
LoserMcHill tells us how they got here.
I swear that I did not alter his comment, ,he really said that.
Pitiful.
LoserMcHill tells us how they got here.


When Av Joe loses the debate, he resorts to petty insults. Typical MAGA reaction. 😏


@AverageJoe1 said
Sokrry, your post is rife with statements which are law-breaking activities, thus impossible to respond sensibly to. You get all upset like Sonhouse does.
Dump toxic waste? Imprisoning your wife, which does not make sense as she has courts to protect her.
Settle. Write a logical post. How bout commenting on my query to No1 just above.
Have you finally given up your other account?


@AverageJoe1 said
This piece says we might as well get rid of the Senate. And the States? Yes, if you succeed, separate states will no longer be necessary, as any issue needing a vote would look to all 330M citizens to vote on it. The cowboys where WY used to be would not get their barb wire!! My senate which I love will disappear.
Oh , the filibuster? Would be moot….there is no ...[text shortened]... he frenzy of the moment, let’s consider what we are throwing away, and defend the Electoral College.
This sounds like simple desperation.


@AverageJoe1 said
Interesting that your comment, correct me if I am wrong, does not recognize the Kamala movement to socialism. She does not want socialism? Jesus. You are one disingenuous crap.
Start a thread on that one. Jesus.
Do you really need another primer on socialism?

Sounds like you do.


@Suzianne said
Do you really need another primer on socialism?

Sounds like you do.
The internet is loaded with primers

https://thehill.com/opinion/4895506-kamala-harris-socialist-policy/


@AverageJoe1 said
Interesting that your comment, correct me if I am wrong, does not recognize the Kamala movement to socialism. She does not want socialism? Jesus. You are one disingenuous crap.
Start a thread on that one. Jesus.
"Interesting that your comment, correct me if I am wrong, does not recognize the Kamala movement to socialism."
not interesting, just factually correct.

"She does not want socialism?"
She does not.

"Start a thread on that one."
No thanks, it's not a particularly interesting subject and it's common knowledge. To anyone even slightly educated


@AverageJoe1 said
Then look at your comrade just above.
For the record, let me say I just left a 2 week think tank, for lack of a better word. Some plan to sell everything if she wins.
You and your comrade…..do you not know why? Don’t you!?
"Some plan to sell everything if she wins."
How can they sell everything if she wins and implements communism? It will be confiscated first


@Zahlanzi said
"Some plan to sell everything if she wins."
How can they sell everything if she wins and implements communism? It will be confiscated first
Election Nov 5th

Inauguration. January 20 2025.

So, those who feel uneasy about her have about 76 days to settle their affairs.

Alas, the only purchaser, as everyone runs for the hills, will be the government! You win!,,

2 edits

@AverageJoe1 said
This piece says we might as well get rid of the Senate. And the States? Yes, if you succeed, separate states will no longer be necessary, as any issue needing a vote would look to all 330M citizens to vote on it. The cowboys where WY used to be would not get their barb wire!! My senate which I love will disappear.
Oh , the filibuster? Would be moot….there is no ...[text shortened]... he frenzy of the moment, let’s consider what we are throwing away, and defend the Electoral College.
What BS. Abolition of the EC would require a Constitutional amendment, but Amendments are allowed under the Constitution and 27 have been added to it.

So how is proposing an amendment according to procedures outlined in the Constitution "attacking it"? Was the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery an "attack" on the Constitution? When women were no longer denied their right to vote because of the 19th Amendment was that an "attack" on the Constitution? Right wingers have been pushing an economically foolish Balanced Budget Amendment for decades; are they "attacking" the Constitution?

A large majority of US voters support ending the EC.https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/09/25/majority-of-americans-continue-to-favor-moving-away-from-electoral-college/

Who said the EC was "a disaster for democracy...... a total sham and a travesty"? https://thehill.com/blogs/twitter-room/other-news/133889-trump-calls-for-revolution-blasts-electoral-college/


@spruce112358 said
So from your post, I take it you are worried about your goats? That could be a concern. My advice would be to keep them securely penned up at night.

I have possums. I'm not worried about Islamic extremists having their way with them.

Anyway, they aren't really mine. The possums can do as they please.

But I don't think it's physically possible, quite frankly.
Lemmiwinks!

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
The internet is loaded with primers

https://thehill.com/opinion/4895506-kamala-harris-socialist-policy/
🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mchill said
Tell us one of the differences in those immigrants of yore and the immigrants of today.

Immigrants of yore came here by sea. Immigrants of today came here by land

- So, what's your point Joe?
McHill never responded to this, what is new. An elementary thinker, says migrants of yore were like our present illegal invaders.

Just pitiful. No need to respond Mc.