@averagejoe1 said"YOur posts are disengenuous."
YOur posts are disengenuous.
Living in a socialist bubble makes you say say that so much should be 'free', which, of course, it is not.
Why do you call anyone with money greedy? I dont get you there. Lack of conscience? What in the hell?
The Court decsions was based purley on the constitution. You say it was not, and dream up what they were reeeaaaaallly doin ...[text shortened]... r you. Who knew? Brilliant.
You are just venting, you are mad, libs are always mad and angry.
You have no idea what that word means
"Living in a socialist bubble makes you say say that so much should be 'free', which, of course, it is not."
ah, the old "it's not free, it's paid for with taxes". Well duh, that's what every socialist is saying: i want taxes to pay for this and not that. I want everyone to have healthcare, not to add another hundred billions to military spending. I want education not tax cuts for the rich. I want roads and hospitals and bridges, not waste. I want the economy to work for everyone, not just the 1%
"Why do you call anyone with money greedy? I dont get you there. Lack of conscience? What in the hell?"
If you have more money than you can spend in a lifetime and you want more, that makes you greedy. It's the fukin definition of the word. You're having issues with what words mean now? If the means of acquiring wealth are actively hurting people around you that also means you have no conscience. I see you have trouble with that as well.
All your posts reveal you are a sociopath, completely devoid of empathy (or you play one). So are the billionaires, but they are competent sociopaths. You are just a little ahole who will never be a billionaire but you like to dream of what you would do if you were
" You are just venting, you are mad, libs are always mad and angry."
If thinking that makes you feel better... Go ahead, say you triggered a lib or have a celebratory self loving
@suzianne saidWhy do libs get so personal. She does not like us and wants us to know it. I feel like she is waving a poster in our face with a white face and stringly long hair , and the ever-present glasses ,,,,,and the tattoos, lord, the tatoos. Shouting! Telling us what she is thinking about something. I am off to a golf game and she stands in front of my car chanting transpeople, which are of course none of my business,,,,i do not want to know or understand them, I don't care about them. So they do this as if they are conveying a message, like if I said to my dog there is a new movie on Netflix. He doesn't give a crap. Take your trans, Sue.
Yet correct. Being right is stupid now, to you?
@shavixmir saidAnd you misrepresnet the diff in our countries. YOuleft out dependency. Stand up like a man. Do you get a check from your government. You can couch your answer, like, saying NO, since it really is direct-deposited, thus not a check.
So? People in Europe fit your definition of freedom exactly.
The only restriction is that you can’t walk around town armed with a gun.
Other than that we’re much more free than US citizens. Even our privacy laws are stricter… protecting us from too much government looking over our shoulders.
You live in a bubble of crazy, dude.
Do you get money or not>. Where does it come from? Who made it.?
@jimmac saidZahlanzi will not TOUCH this post.
Nothing, Man made, is, nor can be, "FREE", nothing, except for that which one chooses to give you. Even then it has cost them and they bore that cost. And the smiles that covid stole for so long. What is free to you is not free.
What you mean by "free" is that someone else has to make the phone and give it to you, or will you take someone elses money to pay for it?. nice. And ...[text shortened]... ff is so cheap.
The internet, Paid by others, not free, I can almost agree with, but with limits.
Zahlanzi, you will not Touch this Post. And one of you just asked me if I knew the def of disingenuous.
Sure. Zhalanzi is the definition.
@averagejoe1 saidI "touched" it when i replied to you. Since he said the same dumb crap you did i don't feel the need to repeat myself
Zahlanzi will not TOUCH this post.
Zahlanzi, you will not Touch this Post. And one of you just asked me if I knew the def of disingenuous.
Sure. Zhalanzi is the definition.
@zahlanzi saidThink of how shallow and short-sighted you are. You lambast those rich people, the 1% who pay 50% of the taxes in the USA. The rich, who reinvest their money which translates to economic growth, freedom, and opportunity. Did you ever tell us how many inventions are created in Romania? Did you read where I pointed out that we have 650,000 patents a year in the USA. Tell us, again what does Romania create?
"YOur posts are disengenuous."
You have no idea what that word means
"Living in a socialist bubble makes you say say that so much should be 'free', which, of course, it is not."
ah, the old "it's not free, it's paid for with taxes". Well duh, that's what every socialist is saying: i want taxes to pay for this and not that. I want everyone to have healthcare, not to add ...[text shortened]... ng that makes you feel better... Go ahead, say you triggered a lib or have a celebratory self loving
So, part two, if you rain hell down upon the 1%, rich, it will not leave much left for you socialists to pick over. You will be at the city dump looking for something to eat. I am right, you know I am right. Leave them the hell alone and ride their coattails.
Do you want roads? We have roads over here, and we work on them every day, so I don’t get you there. Healthcare, same thing. It’s called Obamacare. This is why you are so disingenuous. Zahlanzi.= disingenuous.
Next…..my,my, you literally want to tell me that I should not make any more money than I need to live on. You are insane. Next you and Bernie Sanders will tell us how much we need to live on. What if I have four houses and want a fifth house. I don’t need that fifth house. So you liberals are going to tell us how to live. Sonhouse would call this losing democracy, and here you want the liberals to lose our democracy.
Next…How does a man who is rich hurt other people by being rich? I thought he created jobs for those people. Do you want to restrict him to the extent that he cannot create those jobs? That will mean you will have to find jobs created by poor people ……are you with me here, Zahlanzi?
Next,you vent personal about average Joe, you tell me I am a sociopath, etc. etc. That has nothing to do with this post but, let’s say I am… Is that any of your business. That is like saying it is your business how much money people have. Your brain must be a bowl of mush.
Uhhhh, y’all really are sad, mad and angry… Just read the posts of some of your contemporaries. Now I am going to spend some money on the golf course. Have a great afternoon.
@averagejoe1 saidIf you don't care about them, then for God's sake, stop supporting politicians who hate them.
Why do libs get so personal. She does not like us and wants us to know it. I feel like she is waving a poster in our face with a white face and stringly long hair , and the ever-present glasses ,,,,,and the tattoos, lord, the tatoos. Shouting! Telling us what she is thinking about something. I am off to a golf game and she stands in front of my car chanting transpeo ...[text shortened]... f I said to my dog there is a new movie on Netflix. He doesn't give a crap. Take your trans, Sue.
@suzianne saidIf a politician has a single platform which is to hate them, then I would not support the politician. No argument.
If you don't care about them, then for God's sake, stop supporting politicians who hate them.
If that same politician has several other platforms which are the ones that Trump runs on, the ones that are to make America great, I will hold my nose and vote for that politician regardless of what those aberrant people are doing. In doing so, it will give them a free society within which to practice their lifestyles, like the lifestyle of Shav which he talks about all the time. I just think they should be respectful and not block my car with their 'message' while I am tryign to practice My lifestyle. I am glad to have this opportunity to clear this up.;
1 edit
@jimmac saidI am answering this post for Zahlanzi, who would not answer it.
Nothing, Man made, is, nor can be, "FREE", nothing, except for that which one chooses to give you. Even then it has cost them and they bore that cost. And the smiles that covid stole for so long. What is free to you is not free.
What you mean by "free" is that someone else has to make the phone and give it to you, or will you take someone elses money to pay for it?. nice. And ...[text shortened]... ff is so cheap.
The internet, Paid by others, not free, I can almost agree with, but with limits.
This is Zahlanzi. It is my opinion that a society where all money goes into one pot and we split it up is the best and most fair of all societies. That is different than your saying that the money is 'free'. Yeah, that's it. It is not the same thing. Yeah....
So, it would follow that Nanny Government would oversee these disbursements of cash, cell phones, etc, to keep it, you know, fair. Think about it....it is hardly fair if one person gets an unequal amount of cash from Nanny Government. When it is all disbursed equally and CONTROLLED by Nanny, then you can hardly say it is free when we all get the same. Instead, you would say we share in the production of all. And since we all have equal amounts, there are less shootings in Romania, we are all much happier, at the expense of being much less productive. But riding around for months in a car like Shav does is a fair trade off.
And why be productive? That is not our thing. We realize that if one of us works harder than another, there is no reward. Why risk if there is no reward.
I hope that clarifies the way that the world ought to be. My cousin in the USA says we appear to feed off of each other, which I find offensive.