1. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    27 Feb '21 19:41
    We take it in turn to list a fragment from a law.
    Then people guess if it's a law from the US (land of the free and home of the brave), China or Russia.


    Here i will start, this should be an easy one:

    "[A] public officer, employee, or contractor [...] may not release to the public the number of votes cast in the general election for the office of the president"
  2. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    27 Feb '21 20:10

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  3. SubscriberAverageJoe1
    Gimme It! Free Stuf!
    Lake Como
    Joined
    27 Jul '10
    Moves
    51916
    28 Feb '21 02:03
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    DAm Zahlanzi, she didn't even let you off of ground zero. Snarky crowd...but not me.
  4. Joined
    18 Jan '05
    Moves
    11601
    28 Feb '21 03:21
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    Do you always deliberately miss the point, just wondering.
  5. Joined
    18 Jan '05
    Moves
    11601
    28 Feb '21 03:22
    @zahlanzi said
    We take it in turn to list a fragment from a law.
    Then people guess if it's a law from the US (land of the free and home of the brave), China or Russia.


    Here i will start, this should be an easy one:

    "[A] public officer, employee, or contractor [...] may not release to the public the number of votes cast in the general election for the office of the president"
    The good old US of A??
  6. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Read a book!
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18677
    28 Feb '21 04:41
    @averagejoe1 said
    DAm Zahlanzi, she didn't even let you off of ground zero. Snarky crowd...but not me.
    Slow down, Joe, you're betraying your ignorance.
  7. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87834
    28 Feb '21 05:15
    @zahlanzi said
    We take it in turn to list a fragment from a law.
    Then people guess if it's a law from the US (land of the free and home of the brave), China or Russia.


    Here i will start, this should be an easy one:

    "[A] public officer, employee, or contractor [...] may not release to the public the number of votes cast in the general election for the office of the president"
    I would presume most Western democracies.

    There are set rules for who can release what information. Employees and contractors are certainly out of bounds. I don’t know what a public officer is.

    So, I’ll say US and Russia.
    I would presume the Chinese leader is elected by parliament.
  8. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    28 Feb '21 05:22

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  9. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87834
    28 Feb '21 05:41
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    I would presume so.
    The role would be more like a chairman or prime minister than an actual president.
  10. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    28 Feb '21 13:33
    @jimmac said
    The good old US of A??
    It was an easy guess for start 😀 Bonus points if you know what state it is.
  11. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    28 Feb '21 13:39
    @shavixmir said
    I would presume most Western democracies.

    There are set rules for who can release what information. Employees and contractors are certainly out of bounds. I don’t know what a public officer is.

    So, I’ll say US and Russia.
    I would presume the Chinese leader is elected by parliament.
    "There are set rules for who can release what information"
    yeh, but it takes a special kind of "democracy" to set it so nobody can release that information.

    There is also a special clause i didn't reveal that would have given it away: nobody can reveal the total number of votes until the electors meet and then they can just tell you the percentages. As in "trust us the percentages are true, no need to verify actual numbers".
  12. Subscriberkevcvs57
    Flexible
    The wrong side of 60
    Joined
    22 Dec '11
    Moves
    37036
    28 Feb '21 13:48
    @zahlanzi said
    "There are set rules for who can release what information"
    yeh, but it takes a special kind of "democracy" to set it so nobody can release that information.

    There is also a special clause i didn't reveal that would have given it away: nobody can reveal the total number of votes until the electors meet and then they can just tell you the percentages. As in "trust us the percentages are true, no need to verify actual numbers".
    Texas?
  13. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    01 Mar '21 14:50
    @kevcvs57 said
    Texas?
    North Dakota
  14. Subscriberkevcvs57
    Flexible
    The wrong side of 60
    Joined
    22 Dec '11
    Moves
    37036
    01 Mar '21 15:00
    @handyandy said
    Slow down, Joe, you're betraying your ignorance.
    Oh that cat jumped out of the bag and ran up the curtains a while back Andy.
  15. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9549
    02 Mar '21 04:43
    @zahlanzi said
    We take it in turn to list a fragment from a law.
    Then people guess if it's a law from the US (land of the free and home of the brave), China or Russia.


    Here i will start, this should be an easy one:

    "[A] public officer, employee, or contractor [...] may not release to the public the number of votes cast in the general election for the office of the president"
    I don't know if it's true but lots of people are saying it: this post is on point. The US election system demands anonymity of votes and a trust in state governments to run elections as they see fit.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree