@deepthought saidI NEVER said she was a homosexual. STOP ASSUMING!
The content of your first paragraph seems inconsistent with your second. If she is homosexual why would she be licking Weinstein's face.
@metal-brain saidSecond paragraph of the second post on the previous page. You are aware that lesbian means female homosexual?
I NEVER said she was a homosexual. STOP ASSUMING!
@deepthought saidI NEVER said that about Oprah. She is probably bisexual.
Second paragraph of the second post on the previous page. You are aware that lesbian means female homosexual?
Where is the contradiction?
@metal-brain saidWow somebody who’s a media mover and shaker and hangs out with Hollywood types had three acquaintances who turn out to be sexual predators. Well that’s it then another piece of nonsense curtesy of MB whilst trying to distract attention from trumps criminality and Russian election meddling. You could probably knock off for the day MB, Gorky Park is nice this time of year.
Russiagate is not rampant speculation? At least I have pics to prove Oprah colluded with Weinstein. Your Trump/Russia conspiracy theory has nothing even close to what I just revealed about Oprah. John of god and Bill Cosby too. She was good friends with 3 known sexual predators. Add the 2 sex scandals at her African school and that makes Russiagate seem ridiculous in comp ...[text shortened]... ar that? That is the sound of people laughing at you and your double standards that reach absurdity.
@kevcvs57 saidIn the name of good sportsmanship, dear Kev, can you specify what the Russians did to meddle in US elections?
Wow somebody who’s a media mover and shaker and hangs out with Hollywood types had three acquaintances who turn out to be sexual predators. Well that’s it then another piece of nonsense curtesy of MB whilst trying to distract attention from trumps criminality and Russian election meddling. You could probably knock off for the day MB, Gorky Park is nice this time of year.
Sorry I have to bore you with what you think are obvious infractions in US elections
1 edit
@kevcvs57 saidSo you have conspiracy theory that Russia colluded with Trump. That was exposed as a corrupt hit job.
Wow somebody who’s a media mover and shaker and hangs out with Hollywood types had three acquaintances who turn out to be sexual predators. Well that’s it then another piece of nonsense curtesy of MB whilst trying to distract attention from trumps criminality and Russian election meddling. You could probably knock off for the day MB, Gorky Park is nice this time of year.
https://www.rt.com/usa/498070-clinesmith-fbi-guilty-russiagate/
Democrats have more ties to Russia than you know. Did you think the corporate news media would have told you about it? Propaganda by omission is common.
"Accuse your opponents of what you yourself are doing."
https://germanpropaganda.org/intro/
The democrats are effective Nazi propaganda. They are guilty of Russian collusion so they are accusing Trump of it. John Podesta is guilty of Russia collusion. He even has ties to Manafort. It is much more complicated than most people think.
@metal-brain said"Metal Brain" must be the next step up from "Tin Foil Hat".
"Accuse your opponents of what you yourself are doing."
https://germanpropaganda.org/intro/
The democrats are effective Nazi propaganda. They are guilty of Russian collusion so they are accusing Trump of it. John Podesta is guilty of Russia collusion. He even has ties to Manafort. It is much more complicated than most people think.
@earl-of-trumps saidThey hacked the DNC servers and released emails in the service of, and as requested by, Donald Trump. It’s not rocket science is it earl?
In the name of good sportsmanship, dear Kev, can you specify what the Russians did to meddle in US elections?
Sorry I have to bore you with what you think are obvious infractions in US elections
3 edits
@kevcvs57 saidO, contraire, Kev, it is rocket science. At least you don't get it.
They hacked the DNC servers and released emails in the service of, and as requested by, Donald Trump. It’s not rocket science is it earl?
1) how does releasing emails into the media constitute "election meddling"? It doesn't.
2) you have no evidence whatsoever who called for this action, and in the end,
if Trump or anyone else wants to warn the public about how the DNC acts, how is
this "election interference"?
I realize that this sub thread should not be in here. Regret bringing it up here, but maybe some day elsewhere.
EDIT to add: Was Hilary's paying $millions for the Steele Dossier to be constructed "election interference"?
1 edit
@earl-of-trumps saidOf course it constitutes election meddling stop being silly and he called for the Russians to release them live on stage.
O, contraire, Kev, it is rocket science. At least you don't get it.
1) how does releasing emails into the media constitute "election meddling"? It doesn't.
2) you have no evidence whatsoever who called for this action, and in the end,
if Trump or anyone else wants to warn the public about how the DNC acts, how is
this "election interference"?
I realize that ...[text shortened]... dd: Was Hilary's paying $millions for the Steele Dossier to be constructed "election interference"?
You really need to keep up with current affairs perhaps if you only shove your head up so far and keep your eyes and ears in the fresh air.
@earl-of-trumps saidThe Mueller Report was followed up by a Rep-led Senate committee report; both concluded that Russian agents actively meddled in the election. There was sufficient evidence for several Russians to be indicted. They will never stand trial, of course, because they fled the country to a place from which they cannot be extradited.
In the name of good sportsmanship, dear Kev, can you specify what the Russians did to meddle in US elections?
Sorry I have to bore you with what you think are obvious infractions in US elections