1 edit
Originally posted by KazetNagorraThen who was this "We" you spoke of? You obviously didn't mean 'we' the American people.
I can't speak for concerns "the French" may or may not have with respect to Clinton.
We certainly know what to expect from her - a continuation of pro-business policies and moderate social policies while not tackling any structural problems of the US economy or society in general.
Originally posted by no1marauderBe happy, as you obviously wouldn't be voting for any conservative or republican.
Nominees generally do subtly pivot but this is clumsy and amateurish coming so soon after his last rivals withdrew and when considerable numbers of the conservative base are still not sold on Trump. It is what you would expect out of a neophyte and less of a strategy then a mimic of an actual strategy.
Originally posted by lemon limeI meant "we" as in "one" or "everyone," as in the following examples:
Then who was this "We" you spoke of? You obviously didn't mean we the American people.
"We know what's 1+1: it's 2."
"We know humans and chimpanzees evolved from a common ancestor."
"We know the Big Bang occurred approximately 14 billion years ago."
Originally posted by KazetNagorraStill some confusion on "we". The "we" that accept premise one, may not accept 2 and 3.
I meant "we" as in "one" or "everyone," as in the following examples:
"We know what's 1+1: it's 2."
"We know humans and chimpanzees evolved from a common ancestor."
"We know the Big Bang occurred approximately 14 billion years ago."
