@wajoma saidNo stupid but it debunks your gay fantasy about a lovers tiff, an experienced dispatcher grasped from the phone call that an intruder was attacking the home owner and when the police arrived that exactly what they claim to have found, no gay tryst ( dry your eyes, maybe one day ) just a maniac attacking the husband of the house speaker as an act of political violence perpetrated by a MAGA conspiracy theorist. I get that it’s upsetting to be mirrored in this maniac but it’s not too late to get therapy.
The dispatcher did not comment on whether DePape was gay or straight (or if Paul was gay or straight), there were no gay/straight code words. The dispatcher did not comment on whether DePape was a dumocrat or anything else, there were no secret code words for DePapes politics.
@kevcvs57 said"I stupidly thought after the last 24 hours of the debunking depape’s gay Lib status got from multiple reputable sources including the despatch worker and the police on the scene that the maga’s would avoid the subject.
No stupid but it debunks your gay fantasy about a lovers tiff, an experienced dispatcher grasped from the phone call that an intruder was attacking the home owner and when the police arrived that exactly what they claim to have found, no gay tryst ( dry your eyes, maybe one day ) just a maniac attacking the husband of the house speaker as an act of political violence perpetr ...[text shortened]... orist. I get that it’s upsetting to be mirrored in this maniac but it’s not too late to get therapy.
kev the more you amp the bluster the more we know how insecure you are. It's not the job of the police or the dispatcher to speculate on the sexuality and politics of the intruder. Suppose they were having a lovers tryst it seems more likely that Pelosi would use code words, if it were a straight out home invasion I don't think any home invader is going to be allowing any ph calls coded or not, there'd be no reason for coding because just talking on a ph is enough. You see the coded words if anything plays into the lovers tryst scenario more than it proves otherwise.
But of course it doesn't prove anything one way or another, and it especially doesn't prove Depapes politics. But it does prove something, not about the case, or Pelosi, or the police or the dispatcher, it proves something about you kev,you've become hysterical, fanatical and one eyed.
@no1marauder saidThat just begs more questions.
"DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived
and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. "
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1548106/download?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
That's according to the defendant's recorded statement to San Francisco Police.
I thought Paul was being attacked with a hammer. Paul let the police in before he was hit with a hammer or was he hit with a hammer before he let the police in? If it was the latter did Paul call a time out so he could let the police in? LOL!
Why was there glass on the outside of the broken window? Was somebody trying to break out of the house? LOL! Seriously. If the corporate news media and police dept. are going to complain about conspiracy theories they can at least explain why the glass was on the outside of the house. Is that what the hammer that Paul was holding was for? To break his own window?
Also, why a hammer? If he grabbed it for self defense why was that the most convenient tool for the job? Doesn't he own a gun? How many years has his wife been getting death threats and he doesn't own a gun? I'll bet he does. Why is nobody asking that question? Is it because democrats don't like to admit they are gun packers?
@wajoma saidAren't you forgetting DePape's recorded statement to the SF Police? It completely debunks what you and the other nuts like to call the "lover's tryst" theory (which I would call defamation).
"I stupidly thought after the last 24 hours of the debunking depape’s gay Lib status got from multiple reputable sources including the despatch worker and the police on the scene that the maga’s would avoid the subject.
kev the more you amp the bluster the more we know how insecure you are. It's not the job of the police or the dispatcher to speculate on the sexualit ...[text shortened]... the dispatcher, it proves something about you kev,you've become hysterical, fanatical and one eyed.
@wajoma saidThat you repeat a bunch of right wing MAGA garbage doesn't make it non-MAGA.
The vax does kill people, that despite the horsefacekuntNZpriminister and even Joe speaking of the taking the seizure syrup "you may still catch covid but you will not get sick and you will not die."
There's no conspiracy in anything I just said.
Question for No1: Were these the only vids the man (who was described by a friend as progressive and a fan of obummer) reposte ...[text shortened]... ared to discuss the Great Reset, they're more open minded than you and they're not exclusively MAGA.
1 edit
@wajoma saidNo a tsunami of right wing conspiracy posts mirroring trump worlds favourite BS doesn’t prove a thing does it son 🙄
"I stupidly thought after the last 24 hours of the debunking depape’s gay Lib status got from multiple reputable sources including the despatch worker and the police on the scene that the maga’s would avoid the subject.
kev the more you amp the bluster the more we know how insecure you are. It's not the job of the police or the dispatcher to speculate on the sexualit ...[text shortened]... the dispatcher, it proves something about you kev,you've become hysterical, fanatical and one eyed.
@no1marauder saidSame goes for you, I've copy/pasted kevs quote twice so he couldn't try this type of diversion, you've either stumbled into something you're not up with or you're trying the same diversion.
Aren't you forgetting DePape's recorded statement to the SF Police? It completely debunks what you and the other nuts like to call the "lover's tryst" theory (which I would call defamation).
@no1marauder
Depape was not a right winger. That is disinformation being spread by HRC and the like. Depape was a left wing nutjob.
@wajoma saidAnd I stand by every word you right wing antipodean MAGA conspiracy theorists.
Read your quote, I went to the trouble of copy /pasting it twice so you couldn't slither out of it.
It’s not bluster it’s a very accurate description of the character you present on these boards.
Google ‘bluster’ idiot.
@kevcvs57
Now it matters what kind of conspiracy theorist a person is? Is that an acknowledgment that everyone is a conspiracy theorist and we have evolved to picking which kind is acceptable or unacceptable? You are a conspiracy theorist, but at least you are not a MAGA conspiracy theorist. That is where you draw the line. Your conspiracy theories are legitimate, but theirs are not. Right?
1 edit
@metal-brain saidThere's zero evidence of that. His posts make clear he was a right wing MAGA.
@no1marauder
Depape was not a right winger. That is disinformation being spread by HRC and the like. Depape was a left wing nutjob.
Left wingers don't complain about 2020 "election fraud" or post anti-COVID vaccine nonsense. Nor do they wish to break Nancy Pelosi's kneecaps.
@no1marauder saidWhat is your source of information?
There's zero evidence of that. His posts make clear he was a right wing MAGA.
Left wingers don't complain about 2020 "election fraud" or post anti-COVID vaccine nonsense. Nor do they wish to break Nancy Pelosi's kneecaps.
2 edits
@metal-brain saidNo it’s not an admittance of anything of the sort. Sane reasonably well adjusted people know exactly what a conspiracy theorist is. The vast majority of people are not conspiracy theorists, they may be wrong in their assumptions about reality or they maybe misinformed by propaganda or just one idiot telling another idiot stupid stuff.
@kevcvs57
Now it matters what kind of conspiracy theorist a person is? Is that an acknowledgment that everyone is a conspiracy theorist and we have evolved to picking which kind is acceptable or unacceptable? You are a conspiracy theorist, but at least you are not a MAGA conspiracy theorist. That is where you draw the line. Your conspiracy theories are legitimate, but theirs are not. Right?
Conspiracy theorists constantly opt for the explanation to any given event that is the polar opposite to the official, ‘as plain as the nose on your face’ explanation as a guttural reaction for reasons of mental illness or out of a pernicious urge to divide communities and sow division and discontent in its target society often in the employ of foreign powers hostile to the target society but usually they are just damaged people with low self esteem who gain a feeling of superiority by convincing themselves and others that they are privy to little known or contraband information.