@AverageJoe1 saidI'm unaware of any man who has been permitted to play in women's only events.
A comedy? How about Birdcage? Gay city. I loved the movie.
It’s OK wild grass, marauder is having the same problem today. It is astounding that liberals never can get an issue. Are you aware that men want to compete with girls. That would be a good issue to discuss. I think Morado wants to talk about one individual name Renee who used to be a guy and became a girl, b ...[text shortened]... on’t know if he still has his junk or not Crazy stuff huh?
Or, there has always the movies🧚♂️🤔
Examples please?
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidThere's nothing wrong with a guy that wants to go around saying he's a woman. Not many people care about it anymore.
The dude (a suzianne word) has all of his junk, proven. He says he wants to run as a woman, they let him, he wins, most women drop out, ruins their lives, but Suzianne does not care. Creepy, sue. They will ever make it to the Olympics. Read about the estorgen, etc./
Hey, hre is a question. This man, with estrogen, is drugged for performance. the Horse Racing world ...[text shortened]... uld hate it if I were a person that would be classified as dodging issues that I just cannot answer.
But just because a guy can say he's a woman and asks to be treated at work and by the government as a woman, it doesn't mean that right extends to the guy playing women's sports. There's a "rights" line that is becoming increasingly clear and most folks are figuring it out.
You'll never convince the hardcore SJW's that a dude's rights shouldn't over-ride another woman's safety or ability to compete though. But those voices are becoming fewer and fewer as they see women dropping out of sports because of this issue.
@uzless saidThe "issue" as you defined it doesn't exist. Athletic organizations don't allow men to simply say they are now women and compete in their sporting events.
There's nothing wrong with a guy that wants to go around saying he's a guy. Not many people care about it anymore.
But just because a guy can say he's a woman and asks to be treated at work and by the government as a woman, it doesn't mean that right extends to the guy playing women's sports. There's a "rights" line that is becoming increasingly clear and most folks are ...[text shortened]... voices are becoming fewer and fewer as they see women dropping out of sports because of this issue.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidIt's about male vs female vs trans. You know that. Don't play games with words when words are what matter in this issue.
I'm unaware of any man who has been permitted to play in women's only events.
Examples please?
This is the new policy to clarify what a trans person can/cannot do:
The new policy limits competition in women's sports to student-athletes assigned female at birth only. The policy permits student-athletes assigned male at birth to practice with women's teams and receive benefits such as medical care while practicing.
https://www.ncaa.org/news/2025/2/6/media-center-ncaa-announces-transgender-student-athlete-participation-policy-change.aspx
@uzless saidYes, it stands to reason that a really good shot putter or a pole vaulter cannot defeat a man, and so they will simply not take out the sport. Libs will never take that in. They just never get anything. (except other people’s stuff.).
There's nothing wrong with a guy that wants to go around saying he's a guy. Not many people care about it anymore.
But just because a guy can say he's a woman and asks to be treated at work and by the government as a woman, it doesn't mean that right extends to the guy playing women's sports. There's a "rights" line that is becoming increasingly clear and most folks are ...[text shortened]... voices are becoming fewer and fewer as they see women dropping out of sports because of this issue.
What do you mean about a guy who asked to be treated as a girl,,,,,,Who cares what he asks to be treated like? I don’t care what he thinks he is or what he wants to be treated like. I will treat him anyway that I want to.
I don’t get you there.
@uzless saidI'm aware of the policy forced on the NCAA by Trump's threats to punish schools and organizations for allowing transgender girls and women to compete. I trust such policy will be found illegal under the Civil Rights Act as workplace discrimination against them was found to be banned sex discrimination under Title VIi of that act by the SCOTUS.
It's about male vs female vs trans. You know that. Don't play games with words when words are what matter in this issue.
This is the new policy to clarify what a trans person can/cannot do:
[i]The new policy limits competition in women's sports to student-athletes assigned female at birth only. The policy permits student-athletes assigned male at birth to practice wit ...[text shortened]... ws/2025/2/6/media-center-ncaa-announces-transgender-student-athlete-participation-policy-change.aspx
That is unresponsive to my question as you well know. The President might want to pretend transgender girls and women don't exist but they do and have since the 1950s. The SCOTUS has already acknowledged that.
I asked an example of a man who competed in a women's only sporting event. I'm still waiting.
@no1marauder saidagain, playing games with word definitions. you know the OP meant 'trans".
I'm aware of the policy forced on the NCAA by Trump's threats to punish schools and organizations for allowing transgender girls and women to compete. I trust such policy will be found illegal under the Civil Rights Act as workplace discrimination against them was found to be banned sex discrimination under Title VIi of that act by the SCOTUS.
That is unresponsive to m ...[text shortened]... at.
I asked an example of a man who competed in a women's only sporting event. I'm still waiting.
Don't be that guy that stubbornly sticks to the OP's lazy use of terminology as the entire basis for your point. It's weak.
@uzless saidAthletic competitions are divided into boys/men's or girls/women.
again, playing games with word definitions. you know the OP meant 'trans".
Don't be that guy that stubbornly sticks to the OP's lazy use of terminology as the entire basis for your point. It's weak.
IF the organizers of said athletic competitions want to exclude transgender persons, they should have solid scientific evidence that being a transgender person affords an unfair competitive advantage over others. If that is so, I do not object.
I do object to politicians meddling in such matters to pander to hate and ignorance. Nor do I think such decisions should be based on what a majority thinks; protection of members of a minority rights is a bedrock design feature of our system (often ignored it is true).
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidDo you have any meaningful analysis that it is different other than your foxnews-infested feeling on the matter? You think the problem is different now but only offer anecdotes of athletes trying to game the system that were rare and remain extremely rare.
Define ‘It.’ You libs are in our face 24 seven. I think that is all I have to say to let you know it is definitely different now.
The only difference is the amplification of the 'problem' by opportunistic politicians using you.
@AverageJoe1 saidHow you personally treat someone is your business.
Yes, it stands to reason that a really good shot putter or a pole vaulter cannot defeat a man, and so they will simply not take out the sport. Libs will never take that in. They just never get anything. (except other people’s stuff.).
What do you mean about a guy who asked to be treated as a girl,,,,,,Who cares what he asks to be treated like? I don’t care what he ...[text shortened]... r what he wants to be treated like. I will treat him anyway that I want to.
I don’t get you there.
The government trying to treat them in a discriminatory manner is the law's business.
@AverageJoe1 saidThe SCOTUS found that firing someone because they are transgender is illegal sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act.https://www.employmentlawworldview.com/landmark-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-prohibits-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-based-discrimination-in-employment-us/
Yes, it stands to reason that a really good shot putter or a pole vaulter cannot defeat a man, and so they will simply not take out the sport. Libs will never take that in. They just never get anything. (except other people’s stuff.).
What do you mean about a guy who asked to be treated as a girl,,,,,,Who cares what he asks to be treated like? I don’t care what he ...[text shortened]... r what he wants to be treated like. I will treat him anyway that I want to.
I don’t get you there.
The difference between banning them from participating in a sports event because they are transgender is ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, what?
@no1marauder saidYou say 'banned sex discrimination' as if the train people, whatever that could possibly be, are neither male nor female sex. Are you saying they are a 3rd sex?
I'm aware of the policy forced on the NCAA by Trump's threats to punish schools and organizations for allowing transgender girls and women to compete. I trust such policy will be found illegal under the Civil Rights Act as workplace discrimination against them was found to be banned sex discrimination under Title VIi of that act by the SCOTUS.
That is unresponsive to m ...[text shortened]... at.
I asked an example of a man who competed in a women's only sporting event. I'm still waiting.
To a logical conclusion, if people like Sue and AOC and others carry signs over the next few years, ad infinitum, which signs say to admit a newly discovered 'sex', maybe Non-Sexers, or Downtown Sexers or whatever, I think that, with your logic, a place has to be made for them, just as you are trying to make a place for train people sexers.
Theoretically, you cannot deny this. C'mon. Like, who is to say it stops with male, and female and train.?? I do not think I am spelling tain right, it is all so neeeewww.
@no1marauder saidWow a regular speech at some off-the-wall Berkley campus meeting.
Athletic competitions are divided into boys/men's or girls/women.
IF the organizers of said athletic competitions want to exclude transgender persons, they should have solid scientific evidence that being a transgender person affords an unfair competitive advantage over others. If that is so, I do not object.
I do object to politicians meddling in such matters to p ...[text shortened]... f members of a minority rights is a bedrock design feature of our system (often ignored it is true).
What if guy asks you, are there more than two sexes? What are you talking about? Could there theoretically be 3 or more sexes? How many?
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidThen you're an illiterate idiot.
I re-read this. Yes, Marauder is stating that there are three sexes.
A transgender woman is a woman.
A transgender man is a man.