1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidI have no interest in the views on "morality" from a person who worships a convicted felon who another jury also found sexual abused a woman.
What shall I call you. Mengele'?
Note that you do not pronounce that you are against men competing with girls. Instead, you go personal, and yes, a person with your position is queer and in direct conflict witih morality and normalcy, Queer. What do you think queer means!?!? Ohhhhh, the sex connotation. Of course you would think that. No, that is not what I ...[text shortened]... d"
Similar:
odd
strange
unusual
funny
peculiar
curious
bizarre
weird
outlandish
eccentric
"Morality" is irrelevant to the issue except as an excuse by right wingers to punish those they pathologically hate.
And I've answered your stupid question numerous times here, but I'll do it AGAIN: no men shouldn't be allowed to compete in all-women's sporting events.
@no1marauder saidKnowing I will not search your positions saying quite the opposite. After all,… WHAT In. The. Hell. Have. You. Been. Writing. About. With. All. Of. Your. So. Cool. References. To How. Great Train. People. Are.
I have no interest in the views on "morality" from a person who worships a convicted felon who another jury also found sexual abused a woman.
"Morality" is irrelevant to the issue except as an excuse by right wingers to punish those they pathologically hate.
And I've answered your stupid question numerous times here, but I'll do it AGAIN: no men shouldn't be allowed to compete in all-women's sporting events.
When this all came to the fore, I said hell no, absolutely Not! You said nothing like that. You wrote about transex. And thought you enlightened us. The only enlighten I got was you.
You can’t kid a kidder. Nor anyone on the Forum. I did warn you about digging a hole for yourself. You never said no to men vs women. Hell, if you had , what would I, AvJoe, have been writing about.
@AverageJoe1 saidComplaining that you did not get a reference to Renee Richards says what exactly. You're a 35 year old incel living in your grand meemaws basement?!
Marauder, missing the issue, thinks he has accomplished something with this post. What?
@no1marauder saidAnd I've answered your stupid question numerous times here, but I'll do it AGAIN: no men shouldn't be allowed to compete in all-women's sporting events.
I have no interest in the views on "morality" from a person who worships a convicted felon who another jury also found sexual abused a woman.
"Morality" is irrelevant to the issue except as an excuse by right wingers to punish those they pathologically hate.
And I've answered your stupid question numerous times here, but I'll do it AGAIN: no men shouldn't be allowed to compete in all-women's sporting events.
It's interesting that you have told smaller than average joe this numerous times and yet, he keeps accusing you of saying and believing the opposite. Little joe is what one calls a liar, false witness barer, etc. Typical f-ing trumptard.
2 edits
@KingDavid403 saidNo, he did not answer the question, only a yes or no were the options. He peppered the question so much I could not recognize it. In a nutshell, it had absolutely nothing to do with people who are, or consider themselves to be, transgender. But he wrote about that till he ran out of ink. Never said yes or no.
And I've answered your stupid question numerous times here, but I'll do it AGAIN: no men shouldn't be allowed to compete in all-women's sporting events.
It's interesting that you have told smaller than average joe this numerous times and yet, he keeps accusing you of saying and believing the opposite. Little joe is what one calls a liar, false witness barer, etc. Typical f-ing trumptard.
Try this, King and Marauder. The High School has a statistics competition on Saturday morning for some very smart Sophomores. 20 students will have two hours to complete complex statistics problems..(normal distributions, curves tables etc).
Another professor has an extremely smart daughter who is a SENIOR**. He demands that she be allowed to participate in the competition.
King? Marauder? Should she be allowed to participate in the competition?
** She makes straight A's in statistics, but note that that is irrelevant. She is a senior, they are sophomores.
@AverageJoe1 saidIs there a point to these ridiculous questions?
No, he did not answer the question, only a yes or no were the options. He peppered the question so much I could not recognize it. In a nutshell, it had absolutely nothing to do with people who are, or consider themselves to be, transgender. But he wrote about that till he ran out of ink. Never said yes or no.
Try this, King and Marauder. The High School has a stati ...[text shortened]... straight A's in statistics, but note that that is irrelevant. She is a senior, they are sophomores.
I have already given the relevant answer many times; who is eligible to compete in a competition should be up to the organizers of the competition (subject, of course, to relevant anti-discrimination laws).
Will that save you the trouble of making up another thousand silly hypotheticals?
@AverageJoe1 saidI could not recognize it. In a nutshell,
No, he did not answer the question, only a yes or no were the options. He peppered the question so much I could not recognize it. In a nutshell, it had absolutely nothing to do with people who are, or consider themselves to be, transgender. But he wrote about that till he ran out of ink. Never said yes or no.
Try this, King and Marauder. The High School has a stati ...[text shortened]... straight A's in statistics, but note that that is irrelevant. She is a senior, they are sophomores.
We all know this.
