@earl-of-trumps saidWell the alternative in this case I much less draconian, they simply get another job in which they are not in close contact with vulnerable old people.
@no1marauder - quoted:
"' By the early 18th century, Massachusetts added a law permitting local authorities to isolate ill people in separate houses.'"
This is what I mean when I say that there are alternatives to actually injecting someone with an unsafe chemical.
And tell me, this law in your quote above surely was found unconstitutional, was it not? B ...[text shortened]... e talk about isolation
and there sure was talk as to why that was *unconstitutional*. Imagine that.
It’s not a mandatory vaccination it’s a condition of employment vaccination.
-Removed-Yes they are CARE workers and if they don’t CARE enough about the people they are charged with CARING for to protect against a virus that kills them then perhaps they are better suited to a non CARING profession.
Just stop mislabelling it as mandatory vaccination in the UK when it’s actually a condition of service / employment requirement. No one is being forced to have a vaccination, my only proviso would be that they get their vaccine of choice.