Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperI think he's getting at the idea that the climate scientists all got together and decided to conspire to put forth a false theory. What he doesn't realise is that the surface station records only confirm what's found everywhere else and are part of a HUGE volume of knowledge. He does know that every he puts forth a scientific argument it'll be picked apart and he won't be able to find a rebuttal, so he avoids it entirely. He's a denier, not a sceptic.
Question: So what is your contention, that the earth is not warming or that we're not the cause?
Answer: Biased Source.
???????????????
That's like me asking your favorite ice cream and your answer is "It puts the lotion in the basket"
I'm starting to feel a bit stupid for arguing with a fool.