Go back
McDonald's vs. Starbucks coffee

McDonald's vs. Starbucks coffee

Debates

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
24 Aug 10
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

this taste test (at link) preferred McD's.

my last few cups at McD's were very bad, and recently had a very good couple of cups at Starbucks.

but i'm going to have to point that at the cleanliness of the machines, because a year ago or so it was vice versa. (and the recent cups i had at Starbucks were actually lattes, but very good. and this was at an almost-new Target, so the machines SHOULD be cleaner.)

http://hubpages.com/hub/Buying-Mcdonalds-coffee-or-Starbucks-coffee

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
24 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

What kind of twisted sort of masochism would drive anyone to have coffee at either place?

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
24 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
What kind of twisted sort of masochism would drive anyone to have coffee at either place?
there's a place that serves Illy's in downtown San Jose but i didn't have time to try it when i saw it there.

the Starbucks latte WAS really good, so next time i went there i had another.

i'm done with McD's, though.

c

Russ's Pocket

Joined
04 May 06
Moves
53845
Clock
24 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
What kind of twisted sort of masochism would drive anyone to have coffee at either place?
Yes all of starbuck's success is pure marketing. They are a coffee empire that can't make a cup of coffee. Is that what you are saying? I avoided starbucks until two years ago and now I love'em. Pricey but if you ask for the "$1" coffee they give it to you.

T

Joined
13 Mar 07
Moves
48752
Clock
25 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cheshirecatstevens
Yes all of starbuck's success is pure marketing. They are a coffee empire that can't make a cup of coffee. Is that what you are saying? I avoided starbucks until two years ago and now I love'em. Pricey but if you ask for the "$1" coffee they give it to you.
A few months ago I was visiting a friend in Rome, who told me that an American visitor had spent much energy complaining that you couldn't get Starbucks in Italy and that the Italians didn't know how to do proper coffee.

This amused me.

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
25 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

maybe espresso is an acquired taste. an Italian colleague took me to the espresso machine his company had installed in their break room and made a cup for me. he loved it but i didn't, much.

bbarr
Chief Justice

Center of Contention

Joined
14 Jun 02
Moves
17381
Clock
25 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
maybe espresso is an acquired taste. an Italian colleague took me to the espresso machine his company had installed in their break room and made a cup for me. he loved it but i didn't, much.
It's tough to pull a proper shot. The grind has to be right, the coffee needs to be evenly distributed in the portafilter and tamped at the right pressure, the temperature and pressure of the water needs to be precise, the machine components need to be flushed and/or cleaned regularly to prevent the buildup of oils and residue, etc. Also, if you were made italian espresso, it was probably a super dark roast (i.e., burned) which yields a weak coffee (since heat destroys caffeine) with a strong charred taste. Italian and French roasts are used to mask variations or defects in coffee beans; after a bit of roasting, the acids and oils in beans that give them their particular flavor profile are just turned to sugar and carbon. Try the Blue Bottle Coffee Co., I think they're in your area.

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
25 Aug 10
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

thanks ... how about Illy, are they good?

bbarr
Chief Justice

Center of Contention

Joined
14 Jun 02
Moves
17381
Clock
25 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
thanks ... how about Illy, are they good?
Some of this depends on taste. Illy is a blend of a whole bunch of different beans, and it comes (last time I checked) in either a medium or dark roast. So, a lot of the particular qualities of different bean types are being lost in the blend and the roast. Then, their coffee is packed and shipped and stored and shelved. Coffee begins to break down after roasting, and even Illy's packing methods (no oxygen, filled with inert gas) don't prevent the breakdown of oils and acids in the bean. That's a chemical reaction that begins after roasting and continues thereafter. Look, Illy is not bad espresso. It's typical of an Italian espresso; balanced, sweet and bold. If you want something brighter, with fruit and citrus flavors, or with more of a kick, you'll need a lighter roast than Illy offers. If you get a chance in your local market try Intelligentsia (out of Chicago). They are excellent. But nothing beats freshly roasted beans, and I'm sure you can find a local roaster. Hell, I could send you half a pound of the espresso or single-origin varietal we roast here in Seattle if you're of a mind to taste the difference.

Scotty70
Opportunistic

Always working

Joined
27 Apr 07
Moves
205830
Clock
25 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
Some of this depends on taste. Illy is a blend of a whole bunch of different beans, and it comes (last time I checked) in either a medium or dark roast. So, a lot of the particular qualities of different bean types are being lost in the blend and the roast. Then, their coffee is packed and shipped and stored and shelved. Coffee begins to break down after r ...[text shortened]... gle-origin varietal we roast here in Seattle if you're of a mind to taste the difference.
Starbuck's coffee always tastes burned, no matter how you dress it up.

bbarr
Chief Justice

Center of Contention

Joined
14 Jun 02
Moves
17381
Clock
25 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Scotty70
Starbuck's coffee always tastes burned, no matter how you dress it up.
It is burned!

b
Enigma

Seattle

Joined
03 Sep 06
Moves
3298
Clock
26 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
this taste test (at link) preferred McD's.

my last few cups at McD's were very bad, and recently had a very good couple of cups at Starbucks.

but i'm going to have to point that at the cleanliness of the machines, because a year ago or so it was vice versa. (and the recent cups i had at Starbucks were actually lattes, but very good. and this was ...[text shortened]... es SHOULD be cleaner.)

http://hubpages.com/hub/Buying-Mcdonalds-coffee-or-Starbucks-coffee
It's a matter of taste of course. Plenty of sugar can cover up some errors. I'd give the edge to Starbucks (I'll admit, being from Seattle did affect my decision)

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.