05 May '18 23:18>
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/05/lou-dobbs-and-andrew-mccarthy-discuss-the-special-counsel-mueller-counterintelligence-investigation/#more-148877
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleRosenstein to Mueller August 2, 2017:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/05/lou-dobbs-and-andrew-mccarthy-discuss-the-special-counsel-mueller-counterintelligence-investigation/#more-148877
Originally posted by @no1marauderSo the sitting judge doesn't know as much as marerider? LMFAO!
Rosenstein to Mueller August 2, 2017:
The following allegations were within the scope of the Investigation at the time of your appointment:
Allegations that Paul Manafort
.............................
Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Vikto ...[text shortened]... have little doubt that in the unlikely event he does, the charges would be reinstated on appeal.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleHere's a novel idea Mott: Why don't you just let the justice system work. It usually does.
So the sitting judge doesn't know as much as marerider? LMFAO!
Originally posted by @mchillIf it did, Donald Trump wouldn't have become president of your country.
Here's a novel idea Mott: Why don't you just let the justice system work. It usually does.
Originally posted by @mchillwhat makes you think it isn't working?
Here's a novel idea Mott: Why don't you just let the justice system work. It usually does.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleI'm impressed that a right winger now believes in the infallibility of federal judges.
So the sitting judge doesn't know as much as marerider? LMFAO!
Originally posted by @no1marauderinfallibility has nothing to do with it...I think you refer to unconstitutional acts.
I'm impressed that a right winger now believes in the infallibility of federal judges.
Check back after the Judge rules on Manafort's motion to dismiss based on the proper scope of the Mueller investigation.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleJudge Ellis hasn't ruled yet, but a "sitting judge" in DC happens to agree with me and denied Manafort's motion to dismiss based on claims that Mueller overstepped his authority:
So the sitting judge doesn't know as much as marerider? LMFAO!
Originally posted by @no1marauderPolitico is misleading you again.
Judge Ellis hasn't ruled yet, but a "sitting judge" in DC happens to agree with me and denied Manafort's motion to dismiss based on claims that Mueller overstepped his authority:
By JOSH GERSTEIN 05/15/2018 05:09 PM EDT Updated 05/15/2018 05:50 PM EDT
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
A federal judge on Tuesday rejected an attempt by Paul Manafort ...[text shortened]... sion of Mueller.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/15/manafort-mueller-indictment-590215
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleThat article is from last month, moron.
Politico is misleading you again.
"For her part, Jackson has issued no official judgment regarding the issue of Mueller’s authority."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/19/judge-questions-robert-muellers-authority-to-go-after-manafort/
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
Originally posted by @no1marauderLOL...you actually think
That article is from last month, moron.
Judge Jackson's Opinion and Order was filed today. You can read it here: https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000163-6599-d92c-a17f-eddde22f0001