28 Dec '09 04:03>2 edits
I was Listening to the radio the other day and someone was discussing the differences of the youth of today and the youth of the pre-modern era. They discussed how the youth of yester-year worked for the most part and education was often an after thought, unless one was "well to do". Of course, then came the industrial revolution and children working as slaves in factories, which we have all seen pictures of. Then came laws restricting youth from being able to work in such a capacity. Also, the youth of yester-year often married early, not long after puberty. However, today, our youth are told to wait until they are at least 18 and then are incouraged to wait at least another 4 years to get some form of higher education.
So what are some of the pro's and cons of the two worlds? Of course, the obvious pro's are that children cannot legally be treated as slaves earning a meager wage, at least until they are 18. LOL. As for waiting longer to marry, yong men and women have a longer time to decide what they wish to be when they grow up, as well as who they wish to live with for the rest of their lives.
Conversly, what are some of the con's? The radio host referred to youth of today as often listless and often spending the majority of their time avoiding responsibility and the four letter word "WORK". In addition, they are less likely to learn a vocation like the youth of old. The youth of old often worked along side their parents to learn how to survive growing up and/or had some form of apprenticeship. The result was that the youth of old were not only preparing for adulthood in terms of mastering a vocation or working the land, they maintained a certain healthy level of responsibilty in their lives, as much as they were capable of handling. As far as marraige was concerened, the youth of old had children younger in life, when they were more energetic and more likely to survive until their children had matured sufficiently to survive on their own once they passed on. In addition, the youth of old were less likely to experiment sexually as they often picked on partner early in life instead of an endless dating life leading to a myriad of STD exposure. In fact, I saw an article the other day that said the one in four teenage girls have an STD!!
So what say you? Which world is or was better? Of course, it is human nature to think that their way is better, but that does not mean it is or that it should be reconsidered.
So what are some of the pro's and cons of the two worlds? Of course, the obvious pro's are that children cannot legally be treated as slaves earning a meager wage, at least until they are 18. LOL. As for waiting longer to marry, yong men and women have a longer time to decide what they wish to be when they grow up, as well as who they wish to live with for the rest of their lives.
Conversly, what are some of the con's? The radio host referred to youth of today as often listless and often spending the majority of their time avoiding responsibility and the four letter word "WORK". In addition, they are less likely to learn a vocation like the youth of old. The youth of old often worked along side their parents to learn how to survive growing up and/or had some form of apprenticeship. The result was that the youth of old were not only preparing for adulthood in terms of mastering a vocation or working the land, they maintained a certain healthy level of responsibilty in their lives, as much as they were capable of handling. As far as marraige was concerened, the youth of old had children younger in life, when they were more energetic and more likely to survive until their children had matured sufficiently to survive on their own once they passed on. In addition, the youth of old were less likely to experiment sexually as they often picked on partner early in life instead of an endless dating life leading to a myriad of STD exposure. In fact, I saw an article the other day that said the one in four teenage girls have an STD!!
So what say you? Which world is or was better? Of course, it is human nature to think that their way is better, but that does not mean it is or that it should be reconsidered.