The lamestream media won't tell you this, but...
seatbelts kill people.
In fact there's more evidence of the harms of seatbelt wearing than there is of harm from mRNA gene vaccines. Laws for seatbelts have been around for more than 50 years, and we just go along with it. Even though several people every year are decapitated by their own seat belt.
Y'all are out there protesting vaccine mandates when you only need to do it 3 times total but I wear a seatbelt multiple times every single day. Let's work big to small. Seatbelts kill.
@wildgrass saidA seatbelt law is more objectionable than a vaccine mandate regarding an outbreak of a deadly, contagious disease.
The lamestream media won't tell you this, but...
seatbelts kill people.
In fact there's more evidence of the harms of seatbelt wearing than there is of harm from mRNA gene vaccines. Laws for seatbelts have been around for more than 50 years, and we just go along with it. Even though several people every year are decapitated by their own seat belt.
Y'all are out the ...[text shortened]... otal but I wear a seatbelt multiple times every single day. Let's work big to small. Seatbelts kill.
Not wearing a seatbelt only increases the danger for the non-wearer, while those who refuse to get vaccinated are increasing the danger to others.
@no1marauder saidWhat if you're not wearing a seatbelt and the accident launches your body like a projectile through the windshield, injuring someone else? Ever thought of that?
A seatbelt law is more objectionable than a vaccine mandate regarding an outbreak of a deadly, contagious disease.
Not wearing a seatbelt only increases the danger for the non-wearer, while those who refuse to get vaccinated are increasing the danger to others.
1 edit
@wildgrass saidNo.
What if you're not wearing a seatbelt and the accident launches your body like a projectile through the windshield, injuring someone else? Ever thought of that?
Regulatory laws should take account of plausible harms, not far fetched, remote ones.
@no1marauder saidMy point exactly. I did my research.
No.
Regulatory laws should take account of plausible harms, not far fetched, remote ones.
@wildgrass saidSeatbelt laws are cool, as are jaywalking laws.
The lamestream media won't tell you this, but...
seatbelts kill people.
In fact there's more evidence of the harms of seatbelt wearing than there is of harm from mRNA gene vaccines. Laws for seatbelts have been around for more than 50 years, and we just go along with it. Even though several people every year are decapitated by their own seat belt.
Y'all are out the ...[text shortened]... otal but I wear a seatbelt multiple times every single day. Let's work big to small. Seatbelts kill.
@no1marauder saidSome of those non-vaxers have perfectly good personal reasons to avoid vax. Don't get me wrong, I think all should get it. But I, speaking of ole me of course, find it to be a bit overreaching for the conservative part of our society, of which I am part.
A seatbelt law is more objectionable than a vaccine mandate regarding an outbreak of a deadly, contagious disease.
Not wearing a seatbelt only increases the danger for the non-wearer, while those who refuse to get vaccinated are increasing the danger to others.
It is overreach, kids. Suck it up. Unless, or course, you like government control. Ahhh, I just saw a blip across my screen, govt control is one of the main factors where libs and conservatives differ. We cons do not like govt control.
Is this dejavu?
@averagejoe1 saidNo, it's the same false claim you make in just about every single one of your posts.
Some of those non-vaxers have perfectly good personal reasons to avoid vax. Don't get me wrong, I think all should get it. But I, speaking of ole me of course, find it to be a bit overreaching for the conservative part of our society, of which I am part.
It is overreach, kids. Suck it up. Unless, or course, you like government control. Ahhh, I just saw a blip ac ...[text shortened]... factors where libs and conservatives differ. We cons do not like govt control.
Is this dejavu?
@no1marauder saidWonder why so many dont want govt to force it on them? Do you think they might possibly think that covert government would say, hell we got away with that, let’s make them do something else?
A seatbelt law is more objectionable than a vaccine mandate regarding an outbreak of a deadly, contagious disease.
Not wearing a seatbelt only increases the danger for the non-wearer, while those who refuse to get vaccinated are increasing the danger to others.
Naaa, marauder, the govt wouldn’t, would they?
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@no1marauder saidGood point, same to be
A seatbelt law is more objectionable than a vaccine mandate regarding an outbreak of a deadly, contagious disease.
Not wearing a seatbelt only increases the danger for the non-wearer, while those who refuse to get vaccinated are increasing the danger to others.
said for helmet laws.
@averagejoe1 saidI don't see anything wrong with society "forcing" you not to endanger the health and safety of others.
Wonder why so many dont want govt to force it on them? Do you think they might possibly think that covert government would say, hell we got away with that, let’s make them do something else?
Naaa, marauder, the govt wouldn’t, would they?
It probably is the main reason societies are formed to begin with.
@no1marauder saidI see something wrong with invasion of the body of an American. We disagree. What if a certain Scottish person became a citizen here, and it was discovered that disease can be transferred by the un-circumsized. So, this certain Scot is required to be cut. They drag him out of his house and take him to the hospital.
I don't see anything wrong with society "forcing" you not to endanger the health and safety of others.
It probably is the main reason societies are formed to begin with.
I know you have a really good response, can't wait, but my point is made.