@jimm619 saidMe thinks this poster needs to regroup,. She/he clearly eschews the diff in laws and mandates.
What of all the vaccine mandates
in place now?
Vaccines for children to go to school,
there are mandatory vaccines to enter
the military.
Are ''they'' taking away my freedoms when
they require me to have insurance on my car,
to wear a seatbelt, to wear a motorcycle helmet?
There were a number of prosecutions for deliberate
transmission of AIDS......
A Iess than average argument, as usuaI.
The Forum is a lonely road. Some people in the 22st century still think presidents can make law.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@shavixmir saidYou're wrong Shav......
The government doesn’t have the right to mandate?
So seatbelts? Helmets? Taxes? Draft?
Seriously man, you talk so much 💩, the flies have infested the smelly hole which once housed your brain.
His brain is stiII up there
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidA lonely road indeed,
Me thinks this poster needs to regroup,. She/he clearly eschews the diff in laws and mandates.
The Forum is a lonely road. Some people in the 22st century still think presidents can make law.
not one for an always
less than average joe.
Are you WRONG AGAIN?
https://alldifferences.com/difference-between-mandate-and-law/
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidYou, as usual, don't know what you are talking about.
But the govt has no constitutional right to mandate. You libs are missing the news. Hey, if i get on a subway with a contagious flu, I am within my rights to do so. No govt entity can tell me that i can’t. No legal mandate.
The hair net is a rule of an employer. I had dinner out tonight. No hairnets in sight, what the hell are you talking about?!? What manda ...[text shortened]... to get on the subway with a cold. So how do you respond to this scenario ??
No diff, Marauder
Yes, federal, state and local governments can and do pass and enforce regulations to protect the public health and safety.
You're ignorant, but actually the requirement to wear a hair covering for certain restaurant employees is mandated by the Food and Drug Administration:
"The FDA Food Code1 offers two paragraphs in section 2-402.11 that address how and when management and personnel are required to wear hair restraints, as well as what's considered an acceptable hair restraint.
(A) Except as provided in [paragraph] (B) of this section, food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed to effectively keep hair from contacting exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, and linens; and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles."
It even has a rule regarding the use of gloves: "Section 3-304.15 of the Food Code includes guidelines on how frequently employees should change disposable gloves, called single-use gloves in the Food Code, throughout the stages of preparing meals.
(A) If used, single-use gloves shall be used for only one task such as working with ready-to-eat food or with raw animal food, used for no other purpose, and discarded when damaged or soiled, or when interruptions occur in the operation."
https://www.katom.com/learning-center/gloves-hair-restraints-required.html
Surely if the Feds can pass health and safety measures aimed to prevent stray hairs or ungloved hands getting on food because of the health risks, it can pass rules aimed at preventing the spread of deadly diseases among employees and customers.
EDIT: BTW, if you want to ride the subway or use any type of public transportation, you have to wear a mask because the Federal government says so. https://www.transportation.gov/safety/mask-travel-guidance
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
3 edits
@no1marauder said''......You, as usual, don't know what you are talking about................''
You, as usual, don't know what you are talking about.
Yes, federal, state and local governments can and do pass and enforce regulations to protect the public health and safety.
You're ignorant, but actually the requirement to wear a hair covering for certain restaurant employees is mandated by the Food and Drug Administration:
"The FDA Food Code1 offers two para ...[text shortened]... , it can pass rules aimed at preventing the spread of deadly diseases among employees and customers.
''..........You're ignorant............''
This Marauder always ruins
your less than average, fictitious rants huh, doe?
@no1marauder saidIf i step into a restaurant for bkfst, will the employees all be wearing a net Jail time for violaters?
You, as usual, don't know what you are talking about.
Yes, federal, state and local governments can and do pass and enforce regulations to protect the public health and safety.
You're ignorant, but actually the requirement to wear a hair covering for certain restaurant employees is mandated by the Food and Drug Administration:
"The FDA Food Code1 offers two para ...[text shortened]... because the Federal government says so. https://www.transportation.gov/safety/mask-travel-guidance
@AverageJoe1
Just finished my coffee. No nets. No arrests, either. Confusing world. Maybe cops too busy releasing your shoplifting brothers.??
@AverageJoe1
You msy parse words and phrases all day long, a mandate is not a law……if for no other reason, they are created differently. Why would two concepts that you say are the same have different names?
Why do your posts reek of anger😖🤔🤔🤔😀
@AverageJoe1
As to rules of the subway, the govt owns it. The govt does not own a restaurant. Thegovt is the FAA, so, we must follow their Air travel mask dictates. Whew. Wrong again. You are confusing certain other uninformed posters.
You Fellers want the government to own everything and control everything and control everybody. Your mandates are a great start. It is just that we conservatives don’t believe in them. As I have said before, why doesn’t the government get out of the way, leave us alone and let us all prosper?
@eladar saidheh not complying to a basic safety rule so as not to endanger others is "forced out" of work.
Guess you are not really that bright.
If you are forced out of work, you are not unemployed due to laziness.
Sorry I had to explain that to you.
not agreeing too a meager wage and just staying home is laziness.
gotcha.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@averagejoe1 saidTHE COOKS, KITCHEN WORKERS,
If i step into a restaurant for bkfst, will the employees all be wearing a net Jail time for violaters?
.............GENIUS
Can you, at least, try to
not be so, less than average?
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidMine?
@AverageJoe1
You msy parse words and phrases all day long, a mandate is not a law……if for no other reason, they are created differently. Why would two concepts that you say are the same have different names?
Why do your posts reek of anger😖🤔🤔🤔😀
Mandate, imposed by govt.,
carry the same penalties,
and are ENFORCED AS LAW.
While they might not be laws, a mandate is still legally enforceable. In fact, they will often have the same effect as bills that have passed into law. Additionally, mandates can be as widesprad. Returning to the example, the mask mandate puts restrictions on individuals. Some rules will affect business owners.
https://alldifferences.com/difference-between-mandate-and-law/
@no1marauder saidMarauder, sorry to get your passable mind-set into this embroilment, too good to pass up. Remember,, though, regardless the comments of these turkeys, that everything I am saying has to do with the premise that the govt should not do that which is not in the constitution, and the word mandate ain't in there, and to hell with the mandates, your links notwithstanding. Man, if Trump is back, and I hope he is, he will have a field day with mandates. I will love it.
You, as usual, don't know what you are talking about.
Yes, federal, state and local governments can and do pass and enforce regulations to protect the public health and safety.
You're ignorant, but actually the requirement to wear a hair covering for certain restaurant employees is mandated by the Food and Drug Administration:
"The FDA Food Code1 offers two para ...[text shortened]... because the Federal government says so. https://www.transportation.gov/safety/mask-travel-guidance
@averagejoe1 saidThe government is putting measures into effect to stop the spread of a deadly, communicable disease.
@AverageJoe1
As to rules of the subway, the govt owns it. The govt does not own a restaurant. Thegovt is the FAA, so, we must follow their Air travel mask dictates. Whew. Wrong again. You are confusing certain other uninformed posters.
You Fellers want the government to own everything and control everything and control everybody. Your mandates are a great start ...[text shortened]... said before, why doesn’t the government get out of the way, leave us alone and let us all prosper?
Why are right wingers so pro-disease? Do you really think individuals have a "right" to spread diseases?
The Constitution specifically allows the Feds to regulate interstate commerce. All restaurants are involved in such commerce, as are airlines, Uber and Lyft, companies with over 100 employees, etc. etc. Therefore, the Constitution is not an impediment to "mandates" i.e. requiring businesses and individuals to do certain things.