1 edit
@Suzianne saidThere is a forum rule to close posts. You must close your post. What lie of AvJoe?
Except you lie exactly like Trump. I don't know why you do this. Maybe you think he'll reward you. I don't know because I don't understand stupid.
Did everyone see the adjacent thread where little Sue says Kamala should not expected to tell her position on Prop 36 in CA? Sorry, you will be disappointed if you look it up, because...............you guessed it.......she leaves it hanging.
@Suzianne saidEgoist, little hombre, egoist.
You are so used to Trump's lies that you don't believe her when she tells the truth.
You don't know her because you're stupid. We know who Trump is because he tells us every time he has a rally. He's a scumbag self-serving egotist.
Try listening to Kamala instead of doing the "Bla-bla-bla" thing every time she speaks. We know who she is because she tells us. When s ...[text shortened]... or you", we see more of who she is. She's the anti-Trump, which is exactly what this country needs.
I wish I could say we have a 'hard enough' time with your posts, but . alas, we don't.
@AverageJoe1 saidThe kind of help you need wears a white lab coat. 😛 🙂
The response that I expect from you…..
We will never be at a board meeting!
Help me Rhonda
-VR
I'll reserve predictions on the Presidency, except to say that the winner of Pennsylvania takes the cake. Other states are hardly worth watching except insofar as they predict what will happen in PA. I'm not saying the EC will be close (it may not be), but whoever wins Pennsylvania will win, whether the race is very close or not.
Dems win most of the close Senate races, though GOP ends up with 51 or 52.
Dems keep the house narrowly.
@Very-Rusty saidGetting her to tangle on egoist/egotist a bit of a stretch, I guess. No way to find humor with libs.
The kind of help you need wears a white lab coat. 😛 🙂
-VR
Look it up.
@sh76 saidIf T takes Wisconsin, and NC and Ga and AZ, WithOUT PA. he wins. So PA not a slam dunk for the daughter of a marxist professor. Maybe someone will write a book one day . Esp if a daughter of a Marxist becomes president. If she does, the books will be about the nature, or the lack of, Freedom. Fleeting, as it were.
I'll reserve predictions on the Presidency, except to say that the winner of Pennsylvania takes the cake. Other states are hardly worth watching except insofar as they predict what will happen in PA. I'm not saying the EC will be close (it may not be), but whoever wins Pennsylvania will win, whether the race is very close or not.
Dems win most of the close Senate races, though GOP ends up with 51 or 52.
Dems keep the house narrowly.
I think I will join Kamal in her rabbit hole all day tomorrow, I cannot watch this.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidWhen was the last time a president was elected without winning PA?!
If T takes Wisconsin, and NC and Ga and AZ, WithOUT PA. he wins. So PA not a slam dunk for the daughter of a marxist professor. Maybe someone will write a book one day . Esp if a daughter of a Marxist becomes president. If she does, the books will be about the nature, or the lack of, Freedom. Fleeting, as it were.
I think I will join Kamal in her rabbit hole all day tomorrow, I cannot watch this.
You can answer the question, whether or not you are the son of a Marxist professor.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidGiven the tenor of your question , I guess all pres' have won PA when elected? I didn't exactly find it with a googlin, you tell us. Don't get the point of your marxist thingy, do you take exception to my pointing out how weird this is? It is what it is, as granny says.
When was the last time a president was elected without winning PA?!
You can answer the question, whether or not you are the son of a Marxist professor.
And, do you see now how I have been right over the years to predict that y'all will 'own it' by 2028. The open border was a hell of a move.
After this term, by whomever wins, we can fold our tents. Prepare the kids. It will take more ways than one.
AvJoe.
2 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidhttps://thisvsthat.io/egoist-vs-egotist
Egoist, little hombre, egoist.
I wish I could say we have a 'hard enough' time with your posts, but . alas, we don't.
Read it and learn. You can learn, can't you?
And stop calling me a man. Men are most often the ones who are wrong. Like you.
1 edit
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidBush '04 (no Google, honest - I'm an elections junkie)
When was the last time a president was elected without winning PA?!
You can answer the question, whether or not you are the son of a Marxist professor.
@AverageJoe1 saidRight... that's what makes it a prediction and not just a truism.
If T takes Wisconsin, and NC and Ga and AZ, WithOUT PA. he wins.
@sh76 saidThe GOP currently holds a thin majority in the House so the Democrats can't "keep" it. Do you mean you think they'll flip it?
I'll reserve predictions on the Presidency, except to say that the winner of Pennsylvania takes the cake. Other states are hardly worth watching except insofar as they predict what will happen in PA. I'm not saying the EC will be close (it may not be), but whoever wins Pennsylvania will win, whether the race is very close or not.
Dems win most of the close Senate races, though GOP ends up with 51 or 52.
Dems keep the house narrowly.