Originally posted by twhitehead
A little touchy I see.
[b]I assumed nothing.
and most likely mounted right against it in order to avoid any mirrored reflections at all
You assumed too much.
Instead, I was offering scenarios in which the reflection might be possible.
No, as quoted above, you specifically tried to find a scenario in which reflection ...[text shortened]... nce.[/b]
And where are those 'eight additional images'? Where was the man standing at the time?[/b]
A little touchy I see.
Then, per usual, you see very little.
Me speaking of your status as a jackass is nothing more than stating the obvious.
You assumed too much.
Except for the pesky problem of the actual video which shows the camera within inches--- or less--- of the window.
No, as quoted above, you specifically tried to find a scenario in which reflections would be minimised.
Kind of stupid really.
Actually, I was trying to help your cause, offering possible scenarios in which a reflection could possibly be obtained.
With the camera in the position shown on the video, i.e., in such close proximity to the window, it is physically impossible to have caught the image of the person “operating” the camera--- which, as is also shown in the video, he isn’t “operating” any more than a person standing in the middle of their kitchen waiting for the pot to boil is “operating” the stove.
There is a reflection. As you stated yourself, putting the camera up against the glass would eliminate that possibility. Therefore it wasn't up against the glass.
So if it wasn’t up against the glass--- as it is clearly shown in the video from NASA--- where was the camera positioned in relation to the window, exactly?
Obvious as an elephants hind quarters.
We’ve already gone over this: your example was absurd and wrong.
Move on.
On what basis do you make that ridiculous claim?
That ridiculous claim is based on… wait for it… watching the video.
No, it does not.
Yes, it does.
We can do this all day, but the video is as described: the shuttle is in front of the image of the man operating the model.
If the image of the man was superimposed as a reflection off the window, it would be evident over the shuttle, not blocked by the shuttle.
It’s not rocket surgery.
Or by the reflection of the camera.
One small problem: the camera is nearly square, and shaped as a box.
That which blocks the man’s face is consistent with the rear jet exhausts.
But you clearly don't understand it.
Once again, your arrogance leads you to make a complete fool of yourself.
You would think you’d learn by now, but you simply don’t... for whatever reason.
You’re arguing a completely defenseless position (much like your idiotic elephant crap), and continue doubling down on a hard 12, trying everything you can do to make the assumption work--- despite the fact that it simply cannot hold water.
According to you, this image is of one of the astronauts peering out the window of the control room onto the loading dock area.
You’re contending that the image was captured by the camera in the control room, via a reflection off of the window separating the control room from the outside of the shuttle.
You are further insisting that the reflection of the astronaut is cast upon the entire scene and it is all due to the camera’s capture of the reflection off the window separating the control room from the outside of the shuttle.
In these assumptions, you couldn’t be more wrong.
And where are those 'eight additional images'? Where was the man standing at the time?
The rest of the video, of course.
Simple stuff: watch it and you will see no less than eight additional times when that camera is recording activity outside, and despite multiple applications--- including scenes which required zooming, or other forms of manual operation of the camera--- not a single time is a reflection of a person, persons or any part of the control room visible.
Weird, huh.