Go back
NATO Destroyed Libya

NATO Destroyed Libya

Debates

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
27 Feb 22

NATO invades other countries.

https://libyareview.com/21477/russian-foreign-minister-nato-destroyed-libya/

It is time to reevaluate what NATO should stand for.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
27 Feb 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

You beat me to it. I just gave Libya as an example your other thread.

Still doesn't excuse Russia.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
27 Feb 22

@vivify said
You beat me to it. I just gave Libya as an example your other thread.

Still doesn't excuse Russia.
There are no white hats.
White hats don't hold onto power. Only ruthless people do. All the big power players are black hats.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
27 Feb 22

@Metal-Brain
Hey, take your Anti NATO, Anti US, Anti EU and stick it up your ass SIDEWAYS.

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
27 Feb 22
2 edits

@metal-brain said
NATO invades other countries.

https://libyareview.com/21477/russian-foreign-minister-nato-destroyed-libya/

It is time to reevaluate what NATO should stand for.
It is time to reevaluate what NATO should stand for.


Every new administration since the end of WW2 reevaluates what NATO should stand for. The results of those reevaluations have been in the speeches of multiple Presidents, congressional records, and in hundreds of newspapers for the last 7 decades.

Where have you been? 🙄

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
27 Feb 22
1 edit

@metal-brain said
NATO invades other countries.

https://libyareview.com/21477/russian-foreign-minister-nato-destroyed-libya/

It is time to reevaluate what NATO should stand for.
“ It is time to reevaluate what NATO should stand for.”
It stands for exactly this, it was formed as a counterweight to the post WWII Russian empire in Europe. Now Putin thinks he can recreate that empire in the form of compliant defenceless neighbours but he cannot and his gamble in Ukraine has already backfired and he’s looking for an exit strategy from a country that is prepared to fight for every street.
That is without factoring in the long term corrosive effects of sanctions on his economy, military and domestic cohesion.
In short the delusional little Hitler has ffffd it

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
27 Feb 22

@kevcvs57 said
“ It is time to reevaluate what NATO should stand for.”
It stands for exactly this, it was formed as a counterweight to the post WWII Russian empire in Europe. Now Putin thinks he can recreate that empire in the form of compliant defenceless neighbours but he cannot and his gamble in Ukraine has already backfired and he’s looking for an exit strategy from a country that is ...[text shortened]... on his economy, military and domestic cohesion.
In short the delusional little Hitler has ffffd it
NATO stands for invading unprovoked countries.

The destruction of Sirte proves NATO was not concerned about civilian lives like they claimed. What Milosevic did in Serbia was no different than what Abe Lincoln did. Both nationalists. Funny how NATO had to protect Islamic terrorists with ties to Al Qaeda and organized crime. That is what the ethnic Albanians were. Islamic heroin runners.

The heroin trade route had to be protected. That is what NATO stands for.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.