Originally posted by Melanerpes
In mathematics, there is always a zero between -1 and 1 -- otherwise, you'd have absurdities like 1 minus 1 equals -1.
So just because the people who made up the calendars decided not to recognize a year zero, that year still existed. The calendars for the BC years are thus all off by one year and this error should be corrected.
In theory, the idea d, but in reality, they're 0 yrs old. So year 0 was the year in which Jesus was 0 years old.
Not sure I agree with you on this one, Mel.
When you're one year old, that means you've been alive for one year. But, when you're 0 years old, you're in your "Year 1" or first year.
If Jesus really was born on Christmas Day something like 2010 years ago, then the same day on the following week would be January 1, 0001, not Jan. 1, 0000. It was Year 1 in that it was the first year. I don't think there can be a year zero. The sandwich I'm eating for lunch right now is my first sandwich of the meal. It is not the 0th sandwich of the meal, even though I have not consumed one whole sandwich yet. Put another way, it is sandwich one, not sandwich zero.
Another example: Tomorrow will be Day one of my new diet when I'm going to start losing those pesky 15 lbs for the 7000th time. It will not be Day zero, even though I will not have completed a successful day yet.