@AverageJoe1 saidBesides the morality of the issue, as I’ve pointed out, you will need infrastructure for such a large project. And workers to guard the concentratio… oh, I mean deportation camps… where do you plan to get all these people from? The communities you are going to deport?
If Biden has plans to pay about $680B towards the debts incurred by people who borrowed their tuitions (and nothing for other citizens),,,,,what is wrong with spending $968B to rid ourselves of these invading people? Y’all have been saying there is no way he can do it….Apparently, there is.
“A critical near-term priority is finding the money to pay for it. An estim ...[text shortened]... the U.S. illegally could cost $968 billion over more than a decade, or roughly $88 billion a year”.
Who’s going to be rounding up millions of people?
You are also going to wreck havoc in the building and farming industries, with a large amount of cheap labour being extruded from the workforce. How do you plan on compensating this? Food more expensive? Or just force black people into slave labour perhaps?
And yes, this last option is of course a joke, referring to the text messages people claim to be receiving on tictoc (not that I have tictoc or whatever it’s called, but a young friend showed me the videos).
@shavixmir saidHow many people do you think they can cram into a boxcar for a train ride to the border? If it was good enough for the Polish Jews, it's good enough for the "invaders", right?
Besides the morality of the issue, as I’ve pointed out, you will need infrastructure for such a large project. And workers to guard the concentratio… oh, I mean deportation camps… where do you plan to get all these people from? The communities you are going to deport?
Who’s going to be rounding up millions of people?
And trains can carry lots of boxcars. Everyone expects them to respect the law vis a vis deportation hearings. They might hold a few but as soon as they get a boxcar full, it's on the next train out. They're not gonna spend that kind of money building camps, not when it can just as easily just go in someone's pocket. Do you really think they'll give a damn whether they get there alive? Women, kids, no difference. They sent women and kids to Birkenau too, right?
If DeSantis and Abbott can put people on buses to Democrat cities, what makes you think they won't stuff boxcars with them and send them to the border? Who gives a f--k what happens to them after that, or even if they all get there alive, right?
Here's the kicker. How many does Trump say are here? I've heard wild numbers like 20,000 or even 40,000. The actual number is barely over 11,000. Where are they gonna get the rest? They gotta makeup the numbers they already said are here, right? Otherwise, all the MAGA people won't believe they got rid of all of them. Citizens who look like they just got off the bus from Mexico, that's who. Latinos who also voted for Trump, by all estimates. Do you think Trump's gonna care about 'papers'? "Get rid of them, get 'em outta here!"
No need for infrastructure. Ship 'em out, no questions!
@AverageJoe1 saidHow about something that isn't straight-up fantasy?
I will save this article to post and repost until y'all run for the hills. Truly, your problem is that you only listen to your news outlets. The don't like Trump, many of us don't ,so they never write the good stuff.
Here is the good stuff. There are many more, if this doesnt suit.
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/
Got anything like that?
@Suzianne saidHow many box cars do you need transport millions of people?
How many people do you think they can cram into a boxcar for a train ride to the border? If it was good enough for the Polish Jews, it's good enough for the "invaders", right?
And trains can carry lots of boxcars. Everyone expects them to respect the law vis a vis deportation hearings. They might hold a few but as soon as they get a boxcar full, it's on the next train ...[text shortened]... "Get rid of them, get 'em outta here!"
No need for infrastructure. Ship 'em out, no questions!
And where these trains full of people going to go? A country needs to accept people, you can’t just dump 100.000 people over a border.
The logistics of such an operation are mind boggling.
@AverageJoe1 saidIf a scientist told you he was going to cure cancer, you'd ask him how. If he had no idea, you'd think he was full of s**t.
How silly to ask me about this future enormous process about which I have no idea. I think I already said earlier that I have no idea. I have no idea how Dr Anybody will find the cure for cancer, either. But he will cure cancer, and Trump will do his damndest to get rid of these people.
Can you tell us how scienteists will cure cancer? Don't dodge my question.
Same principle.
@Suzianne saidWhat will sending a boxcar to the border do? Mexico won't let it pass and then the immigrants will just return home unless they are detained somewhere by the US government.
How many people do you think they can cram into a boxcar for a train ride to the border? If it was good enough for the Polish Jews, it's good enough for the "invaders", right?
And trains can carry lots of boxcars. Everyone expects them to respect the law vis a vis deportation hearings. They might hold a few but as soon as they get a boxcar full, it's on the next train ...[text shortened]... "Get rid of them, get 'em outta here!"
No need for infrastructure. Ship 'em out, no questions!
@shavixmir saidSo was Normandy, June 6. This is important, too.
How many box cars do you need transport millions of people?
And where these trains full of people going to go? A country needs to accept people, you can’t just dump 100.000 people over a border.
The logistics of such an operation are mind boggling.
@no1marauder saidGood question. What about Mexico agreeing to let them back home? And how do we send the Chinese wretches back 'somewhere'? There are 180 countries represented.
What will sending a boxcar to the border do? Mexico won't let it pass and then the immigrants will just return home unless they are detained somewhere by the US government.
I have remarked that it will be interesting to watch DJT crank it all up, I mean all of America. You will soon find out that he is not 'in it for himself'. Just the evidence of his being a family man should be enough to see that.
What I want to see is (hey Sonhouse) how he will employ the gambit of tariffs. He may very well have Mexico over a barrel if they do not play nice with taking their people back home.
@AverageJoe1 saidA "family man" who left his wife and three underage children for his mistress.
Good question. What about Mexico agreeing to let them back home? And how do we send the Chinese wretches back 'somewhere'? There are 180 countries represented.
I have remarked that it will be interesting to watch DJT crank it all up, I mean all of America. You will soon find out that he is not 'in it for himself'. Just the evidence of his being a family man shou ...[text shortened]... may very well have Mexico over a barrel if they do not play nice with taking their people back home.
@no1marauder saidI don't understand this post. If Donald says he will do it,,,,,sure, we may ask how. I am with you up to that, but why go into whether or not he has a idea. He may say 'I am working on it'. Me, I will wait patiently for his solution. You,,,,,you will say 'The Forum wants an answer NOW!' That is an example of the anger that we mention from time to time.
If a scientist told you he was going to cure cancer, you'd ask him how. If he had no idea, you'd think he was full of s**t.
Same principle.
Really, why would I consider him full of s** if he is locked up in the War Room with advisors about boxcars, etc? How can his studies of the problem be full of s*^"?
@AverageJoe1 saidIt's a wet dream that foreign nations are going to accept millions of people, most of whom have lived in the US for years, just because Donald stamps his feet and tells them to do so.
Good question. What about Mexico agreeing to let them back home? And how do we send the Chinese wretches back 'somewhere'? There are 180 countries represented.
I have remarked that it will be interesting to watch DJT crank it all up, I mean all of America. You will soon find out that he is not 'in it for himself'. Just the evidence of his being a family man shou ...[text shortened]... may very well have Mexico over a barrel if they do not play nice with taking their people back home.
@AverageJoe1 saidHe was President for four years.
I don't understand this post. If Donald says he will do it,,,,,sure, we may ask how. I am with you up to that, but why go into whether or not he has a idea. He may say 'I am working on it'. Me, I will wait patiently for his solution. You,,,,,you will say 'The Forum wants an answer NOW!' That is an example of the anger that we mention from time to time.
Reall ...[text shortened]... the War Room with advisors about boxcars, etc? How can his studies of the problem be full of s*^"?
He was running for President for four more (essentially).
When do you think he will actually come up with a plan to do something he has repeatedly promised to do?
Like his "plan" to replace the ACA ("Obamacare" for the uneducated), it doesn't exist.
@no1marauder saidSo B Clinton does not care about Chelsea. You are reaching. I think you be astounded how many of your friends and acquaintances are having, or have had, affairs. The world is seething with desire!!!! Just get your average movie. There are just so many catalysts.
A "family man" who left his wife and three underage children for his mistress.
@AverageJoe1 saidDon't tell me that Donald cares about others because he's a "family man". I'm from New York and saw the tabloid headlines 35 years ago when he was having an open affair while he was married and had three underage children. How's this for a "family man":
So B Clinton does not care about Chelsea. You are reaching. I think you be astounded how many of your friends and acquaintances are having, or have had, affairs. The world is seething with desire!!!! Just get your average movie. There are just so many catalysts.
"Then there's the wholesome 1989 affair President Trump had with actress Marla Maples, which became public after Trump attempted to bring Maples on a family vacation to Aspen, but unsuccessfully hid it from Ivana. Maples reportedly infamously approached Ivana during their family vacation and said, "I love Donald. Do you?" Ivana told Barbara Walters about this reported incident on a 1991 episode of 20/20."
https://www.elitedaily.com/p/donald-trump-marla-maples-relationship-was-full-of-unbelievable-twists-turns-8768360
If you want to grovel before this POS, fine, but don't tell me his qualities include being a "family man". That's too ridiculous for words.
@no1marauder saidI agree. They will not want to deal with it. So, Trump will make them deal with it. Watch SHouse's hated tariffs. They do work both ways, you know,
It's a wet dream that foreign nations are going to accept millions of people, most of whom have lived in the US for years, just because Donald stamps his feet and tells them to do so.
I give him a 75% chance. The kamal person, would have had a negative 10% chance.