Originally posted by Hugh Glass what are you calling entitlements?
From Stockman:
A true agenda to reform the welfare state would require a sweeping, income-based eligibility test, which would reduce or eliminate social insurance benefits for millions of affluent retirees. Without it, there is no math that can avoid giant tax increases or vast new borrowing. Yet the supposedly courageous Ryan plan would not cut one dime over the next decade from the $1.3 trillion-per-year cost of Social Security and Medicare.
A true agenda to reform the welfare state would require a sweeping, income-based eligibility test, which would reduce or eliminate social insurance benefits for millions of affluent retirees. Without it, there is no math that can avoid giant tax increases or vast new borrowing. Yet the supposedly courageous Ryan plan would no ...[text shortened]... dime over the next decade from the $1.3 trillion-per-year cost of Social Security and Medicare.
"A true agenda to reform the welfare state would require a sweeping, income-based eligibility test, which would reduce or eliminate social insurance benefits for millions of affluent retirees."
I'm not sure what the definition of "wealthy" is in suggestion. Tax increases for the very wealthy should go up in any case - back to the 50-60s rate.
Team Romney hasn't seemed to figure out whether it's in support of the Ryan budget or not. Maybe they'll just keep in vague hoping that independent voters won't notice?