Go back
Personality Type N vs S

Personality Type N vs S

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @eladar
Intuitive people vs Sensory people.

https://personalityhacker.com/how-are-sensors-and-intuitives-different/


70 percent of people are sensory but most smart people are intuitive. When they say smart, many times it is how well do you see patterns.

Sensory people deal well with reality. Sensory people have common sense. Intuitive people do not have c ...[text shortened]... e here.

It also links to politics I think. Sensors can see how intuitive theories won't work.
I tried to take it but it would not accept my answers in the comments box, tried several different ways to describe but came back each time. I gave up.


Originally posted by @eladar
Sounds a bit like chess. Anything in there about knowledge of the industry?
Knowledge of industry is part of perspiration.

1 edit

Originally posted by @eladar
Intuitive people vs Sensory people.

https://personalityhacker.com/how-are-sensors-and-intuitives-different/


70 percent of people are sensory but most smart people are intuitive. When they say smart, many times it is how well do you see patterns.

Sensory people deal well with reality. Sensory people have common sense. Intuitive people do not have c ...[text shortened]... e here.

It also links to politics I think. Sensors can see how intuitive theories won't work.
I'm a strong N in that dimension. I'm probably a Briggs-Myers INTP (though perhaps INTJ).

The statement "Intuitive people do not have common sense" is silly. The whole point of using the Briggs-Myers classification system is to avoid those sorts of summary value judgments to better understand others.



The post that was quoted here has been removed
I'm shocked that the tool is riddled with holes.
Didn't see that one coming...

Oh. Wait. Yes. OP... yup.



Originally posted by @sh76
I'm a strong N in that dimension. I'm probably a Briggs-Myers INTP (though perhaps INTJ).

The statement "Intuitive people do not have common sense" is silly. The whole point of using the Briggs-Myers classification system is to avoid those sorts of summary value judgments to better understand others.
Of course generalities are not true for all individuals. For some reason you seem to miss that point.


Originally posted by @shavixmir
I'm shocked that the tool is riddled with holes.
Didn't see that one coming...

Oh. Wait. Yes. OP... yup.
Notice I was talking about types not where the test places you.

Do you do better with step by step or by pattern fron the hole? Do you need concrete or can you handle only theoretical?


Of course personality is not the only factor.


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Text book is neither sensory nor intuitive or another way could be either.


2 edits



-Removed-
Have you had good training?

Have memorized good master's games?



If the brain is the engine and personality is the transmition, then those with intutive skills would have an easier time on IQ tests. In other words, N could be described as automatic and S would be stick.

In any case this is an explanation as to why people think differently. It seems to me that people should be taught to play to their strengths. Intuitive people intuitive methods while sensory should be taught by sensory methods.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.