"Police Officers ................. Run Amok"

@mott-the-hoople said
we have a jury system for such cases as this...this judge of yours is being totalitarian in his actions.

Juries don't rule on preliminary injunctions.

@dood111 said
You are right!
Good thing police officers in the USA have ALWAYS been subject to judicial review.
(I'm sure you'll find some nit-picky BS to contradict that)

In theory, yes.

In practice? Not so much.

@no1marauder said
Juries don't rule on preliminary injunctions.

never said they did

@no1marauder said
The idea that police should be immune from any judicial review is more appropriate for a totalitarian dictatorship than a democratic republic based on Lockean principles of individual rights.

Marauder is losing it🙃🤠.”....police SHOULD BE immune from review”. Uhhh, maybe those in N Korea, Cuba, China, Russia. Marauder, i am trying to hang my hat on your comments, it ain’t easy.

@mott-the-hoople said
never said they did

Then your comment "we have a jury system for such cases as this" doesn't make much sense, does it?

@averagejoe1 said
Marauder is losing it🙃🤠.”....police SHOULD BE immune from review”. Uhhh, maybe those in N Korea, Cuba, China, Russia. Marauder, i am trying to hang my hat on your comments, it ain’t easy.

It's best to read the comments I am responding to to understand the context of my remarks.

@no1marauder said
Then your comment "we have a jury system for such cases as this" doesn't make much sense, does it?

makes all the sense in the world, unless you are stupid.

It was my point that cases like this should proceed through the normal court process. Instead this activist judge stepped in when there was no rush.

remember when those acitivist judges were striking down Trumps orders, banning travel from china? now biden bans travel from india and not a peep out of them, not even labeled xenophobic as biden himself said.

@no1marauder said
Then your comment "we have a jury system for such cases as this" doesn't make much sense, does it?

I guess I’m not into demonstrations, the walking in the street stuff. They don’t exactly follow the Martin Luther king rules, anymore, ,,,,so, I have to say the marchers usually ‘have it coming ‘, and should be in jail. Sorry ,sounds rough to tender ears. Tough love we call it.

@mott-the-hoople said
as I said...an activist judge

Never read the Constitution, eh?

@averagejoe1 said
I guess I’m not into demonstrations, the walking in the street stuff. They don’t exactly follow the Martin Luther king rules, anymore, ,,,,so, I have to say the marchers usually ‘have it coming ‘, and should be in jail. Sorry ,sounds rough to tender ears. Tough love we call it.

Are they "uppity"? Is that your point?

@mott-the-hoople said
makes all the sense in the world, unless you are stupid.

It was my point that cases like this should proceed through the normal court process. Instead this activist judge stepped in when there was no rush.

remember when those acitivist judges were striking down Trumps orders, banning travel from china? now biden bans travel from india and not a peep out of them, not even labeled xenophobic as biden himself said.

You really can't see the difference? Really?

@suzianne said
You really can't see the difference? Really?

What is the difference, if I may ask? Hoping that you keep personalities and favoritism and such as that out of your answer?

@averagejoe1 said
What is the difference, if I may ask? Hoping that you keep personalities and favoritism and such as that out of your answer?

she will never explain the difference because there is none.

@mott-the-hoople said
she will never explain the difference because there is none.

Been waaiting all this time, guess i'll go play golf! Rats

@averagejoe1 said
Been waaiting all this time, guess i'll go play golf! Rats

And don't forget, AJ, no Mulligans and no handicap. That is soooooo socialist lol