28 Jun '09 17:34>1 edit
As I posted on another thread, at the suggestion of KN and Generalissimo, I took this political compass test. I was a bit confused by the results, as it put me well to the left of almost every mainstream American Democratic politician.
Obviously, that's not inherently meaningful regarding the test itself. But, I did think the questions were worded in a manner that makes the "left" side sound more reasonable and the "right" side sound more extreme. The way they rank politicians is obviously not from test results, because I'm sure politicians rarely take the test. They take the candidate's positions and loosely use them to answer the questions.
So, to test the test so to speak, I propose discussing each question, one at a time. I'll keep an informal survey of how the forum in general responds to each question. I'm curious to see if even the "right wingers" on this forum end up looking like centrists based on the test. If so, it's probably an issue with the test. If not, then I'm really much more liberal than I think I am.
Each question has 4 choices:
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
First question
"If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."
My answer: Agree
I think this is the first of many loaded questions. The policy at issue is really whether corporations should be forced by governments to sacrifice profits for the government-determined best interest of society. Hence, although ideally the interest of humanity should be served by globalization, of course, I cannot say that I "strongly agree."
Frankly, I think the question should have been worded something like:
"If economic globalisation is inevitable, governments should impose comprehensive regulations on trans-national corporations to put the over-all interests of humanity over the interests of the individual corporations."
If the question were worded like that, I'd be ambivalent about what to answer, but I'd lean towards "Disagree."
Obviously, that's not inherently meaningful regarding the test itself. But, I did think the questions were worded in a manner that makes the "left" side sound more reasonable and the "right" side sound more extreme. The way they rank politicians is obviously not from test results, because I'm sure politicians rarely take the test. They take the candidate's positions and loosely use them to answer the questions.
So, to test the test so to speak, I propose discussing each question, one at a time. I'll keep an informal survey of how the forum in general responds to each question. I'm curious to see if even the "right wingers" on this forum end up looking like centrists based on the test. If so, it's probably an issue with the test. If not, then I'm really much more liberal than I think I am.
Each question has 4 choices:
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
First question
"If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."
My answer: Agree
I think this is the first of many loaded questions. The policy at issue is really whether corporations should be forced by governments to sacrifice profits for the government-determined best interest of society. Hence, although ideally the interest of humanity should be served by globalization, of course, I cannot say that I "strongly agree."
Frankly, I think the question should have been worded something like:
"If economic globalisation is inevitable, governments should impose comprehensive regulations on trans-national corporations to put the over-all interests of humanity over the interests of the individual corporations."
If the question were worded like that, I'd be ambivalent about what to answer, but I'd lean towards "Disagree."