1. Standard memberDrKF
    incipit parodia
    Joined
    01 Aug '07
    Moves
    46580
    17 Aug '10 15:45
    Originally posted by FMF
    The West has got "Russia early 1990s" indelibly printed on its CV.
    And China has "Russia early 1990s" posted on the office wall with "what NOT to do" above it in red pen...
  2. silicon valley
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    101289
    17 Aug '10 20:27
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Since introducing free-market policies, China has lifted 300 million citizens out of poverty, according to the United Nations.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-16/china-economy-passes-japan-s-in-second-quarter-capping-three-decade-rise.html


    🙂
    self-reported.
  3. silicon valley
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    101289
    17 Aug '10 20:32
    SELF-REPORTED

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine

    The Great Chinese Famine (simplified Chinese: 三年大饥荒; traditional Chinese: 三年大饑荒; pinyin: sān nián dà jī huāng), officially referred to as the Three Years of Natural Disasters (simplified Chinese: 三年自然灾害; traditional Chinese: 三年自然災害; pinyin: sān nián zì rán zāi hài), was the period in the People's Republic of China between 1958 and 1961 characterized by widespread famine. According to government statistics, there were 15 million excess deaths in this period. Unofficial estimates vary, but scholars have estimated the number of famine victims to be between 20 and 43 million.[1]

    Yang Jisheng, a former Xinhua News Agency reporter who spent over ten years gathering information available to no other scholars, estimates a toll of 36 million.[2]

    The phrases "Three Years of Economic Difficulty" and "Three Bitter Years" are also used by Chinese officials to describe this period.

    ...

    According to the work of Nobel prize winning economist and expert on famines Amartya Sen, most famines do not result just from lower food production, but also from an inappropriate or inefficient distribution of the food, often compounded by lack of information and indeed misinformation as to the extent of the problem. In the case of these Chinese famines, the urban population had protected legal rights for certain amounts of grain consumption. Local officials in the countryside competed to over-report the levels of production that their communes had achieved in response to the new economic organisation and thus local peasants were left with a much reduced residue.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree