1. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    08 Aug '13 00:08
    The new Japanese President is powering up the Japanese military. They just put a small aircraft carrier into service and he's talking about changing the Constitution.

    Is this a good thing for Japan? How about her neighbors?
  2. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    08 Aug '13 00:473 edits

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  3. Joined
    23 Nov '11
    Moves
    43942
    08 Aug '13 01:02
    Japan has every right to protect its citizens from the crazies who run North Korea. Japan is within easy reach of N.K's nuclear missils
  4. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    08 Aug '13 01:262 edits

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  5. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    08 Aug '13 01:47
    Maybe they will take on the US again. After all, they seem to be pretty resistant to high dose radiation.
  6. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    08 Aug '13 02:30
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    That's my thinking.
  7. Joined
    13 Mar '07
    Moves
    48661
    08 Aug '13 03:021 edit
    The new Japanese President is powering up the Japanese military. (AThousandYoung)

    Japan's President Abe has a reputation as a nationalist who's not truly
    sorry enough about Japanese war crimes in the 1930s-40s (or earlier). (Duchess64)


    Japan is a monarchy and does not have a "President". It has an Emperor and a Prime Minister, the latter being the position that Shinzo Abe holds.
  8. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    08 Aug '13 07:45
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    they can use it as a deterrent. they can preemptively strike launch sites.




    it is insane to consider japan should stick to a promise they made 50 years ago.

    also, one aircraft carrier doesn't mean japan is going to launch a campaign of conquest
  9. Donationrwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    Royal Oak, MI
    Joined
    09 Sep '01
    Moves
    27626
    08 Aug '13 10:52
    They never should have scrapped the Hosho.
  10. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    08 Aug '13 18:02

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  11. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    08 Aug '13 18:27

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  12. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    08 Aug '13 18:49
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    I believe DPRK's missile and nuclear capabilities are grossly over rated. The threat to Japan at present anyway is much more DPRK's conventional army and navy, which would be impaired by tactical carriers.
  13. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    08 Aug '13 19:20

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  14. Hmmm . . .
    Joined
    19 Jan '04
    Moves
    22131
    08 Aug '13 22:27
    Originally posted by whodey
    Maybe they will take on the US again. After all, they seem to be pretty resistant to high dose radiation.
    That's pretty crass, whod.
  15. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    09 Aug '13 01:20
    This helicopter carrier can probably launch and recover F35Bs.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree