09 Aug '13 02:12>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
The post that was quoted here has been removedso basically you get a frowny face if they don't amend their constitution first. ok, they should amend their constitution, THEN get necessary military equipment just in case pugsley does decide to do something other than threat.
The post that was quoted here has been removeddo you have any idea how unrelated and all over the place your arguments are?
The post that was quoted here has been removedI don't think this ship violates the "defense only" rule. Helicopter carriers and V/STOL carriers are roughly the same ship. The offensive arm of ships like that is the jets, but they are used for antisubmarine defensive work with helicopters.
The post that was quoted here has been removedand north koreean nutjobs (and the hostile world power next door) have made the "minimal" self-defence considerably higher.
The post that was quoted here has been removedignorance about what? you don't bloody say clearly what you bloody want to communicate. what do you want? that the japanese dismantle their one freakin baby carrier just because a constitution they were forced to adopt 50 years ago says they can't have any of the cool toys? all this when the north korean are barking like rabid dogs and the chinese are (rightfully) still holding a grudge?