@mchill saidMcHill. Did they have more children than they could afford.? Yes. Goes without discussing. So,, I hereby inject this negative factor into your scenario, for you to respond to.
Tell us why our Daddys and their daddies before them never needed to have child care paid for by the government.
Because they didn't have to take care of the children. Their wives did it. Now wives have to work because it takes 2 incomes to do what 1 income used to. There is no one to take care of the children. You lost this debate Joe.
Liberals 1 Conservatives 0
Damn smarty pants Liberals! 😏
You have to say ‘yes’of course, .....and you opened the door.
So, they have more kids than they can afford, and turn to the government or, frankly, to their neighbors to pay for it. Here again, a no-brainer, that, it is no one‘s business but their own.
OK, we have a good debate going on here , I think I won, and you think you won. The ball’s in your court
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidMcHill. Did they have more children than they could afford.?
McHill. Did they have more children than they could afford.? Yes. Goes without discussing. So,, I hereby inject this negative factor into your scenario, for you to respond to.
You have to say ‘yes’of course, .....and you opened the door.
So, they have more kids than they can afford, and turn to the government or, frankly, to their neighbors to pay for it. Here ...[text shortened]... we have a good debate going on here , I think I won, and you think you won. The ball’s in your court
Joe. First you wanted to know why our daddy's and granddaddy's didn't accept childcare from the government - having lost that debate, now your you're going off in a different direction altogether. However, I'll try to answer your 2nd question - No one knows. The only way to know that is to ask each and every father and grandfather if they "had more children than they could afford"
- Let me know the results when you completed those (several million) interviews. 🙂
@averagejoe1 saidPeople stopped grovelling on the floor in front of their rich pig overlords. You should try it Joe, get off your knees and stand like a man!
Tell us why our Daddys and their daddies before them never needed to have child care paid for by the government. And yet, you weaker people need to have a government pay for your child care. Tell us what happened.
I know you will just make a joke, and answer naught . But it is a curious thing
@mchill saidKev, check out McHill. He does what you do, 4 clicks up on page 1, he says that a guy has so many children that his wife cannot take care of the children she has to go to work. You, even Suzianne, would read that as McHill saying,,,,yes,,, the guy has more children than he can afford,
McHill. Did they have more children than they could afford.?
Joe. First you wanted to know why our daddy's and granddaddy's didn't accept childcare from the government - having lost that debate, now your you're going off in a different direction altogether. However, I'll try to answer your 2nd question - No one knows. The only way to know that is to ask each and every fa ...[text shortened]... ould afford"
- Let me know the results when you completed those (several million) interviews. 🙂
Without discussing the actual issue, with this my post. I wish to point out how he is changing directions, to use his words. HE said guy has too many kids! Suzy would call him a liar!, 🤔
@AverageJoe1
If a guy has more kids than he can afford, to which we stipulate above, what interview is necessary of an actual family with which to prove it.? He either does, or he doesn’t. Whew.
Your serve.
@mchill saidYes, look at the great job the dems have done so far.
Good plan.
I'll be happier though when Democrats have super majorities in both the house and senate, Kamala Harris is president, AOC is vice president, and Pramila Jayapal is speaker of the house. Biden and Pelosi have done their parts and need to retire. 🙂
Now, what else can I add to irritate the right ring? 😏
Can you imagine what would happen if they take over completely?
I think every Democrat in congress should be rounded up, charged with treason, and sent to Gitmo .
Clear the airways please… We are waiting for McHill to explain why people who have more children they can afford, which he has stated above, , need to be covered by the government. It is beyond the imagination of a conservative to think in those terms.
Stand by, I think he is just coming in from a rally and will answer us.
5 edits
@averagejoe1 saidClear the airways please… We are waiting for McHill to explain why people who have more children they can afford, which he has stated above, , need to be covered by the government.
Clear the airways please… We are waiting for McHill to explain why people who have more children they can afford, which he has stated above, , need to be covered by the government. It is beyond the imagination of a conservative to think in those terms.
Stand by, I think he is just coming in from a rally and will answer us.
Republicans are an odd group. They love America, but they really hate Americans. They're so concerned about children while their in the mothers womb, but once born, and the child no longer serves their political purposes, they are tossed away like garbage. However to answer your question - -
Because all children in our great country deserve care, nurturing, education and support, regardless of who they are. If America can waste hundreds of billions of dollars in corporate welfare, weapons programs of dubious value, maintaining unused or vacant federal properties, wining and dining department heads, then they can darn well pony up some bucks to care for our children. Cutting some of this Government waste would more than pay for this badly needed program. If other countries can afford this (and many do) so can we.
Please read the text in the link from the Conservative Heritage Foundation before responding.
https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/report/50-examples-government-waste
