There are many viruses that have been known to re-infect people following a previous episode. The problem with information like this during a pandemic is that you are dealing in such large numbers that you should be able to find an instance of pretty much anything that is possible. You would be very surprised if people implied anything from it without a lot more examples.
1 edit
-Removed-Another possible interpretation is that exposure to one strain caused sufficient immunity to be asymptomatic with another which would be positive in terms of immunity and vaccinations, but the bigger picture here is that you would be drawing conclusions from a single case example which is meaningless in a pandemic. So many have been infected that an incidence of any possible outcome should be out there, whether improbable or likely.
I think people should work with what is known. Admission rates and the trend for serious illness. It's the only thing that has been measured in large numbers throughout.
1 edit
The post that was quoted here has been removedDoes Duchess admit that China totally botched handling the wet markets, which
the Chicoms knew for YEARS could be sources of unwanted viruses?
If China did the right thing and closed those wretched wet markets long ago this
whole COVID pandemic on planet earth never would have happened.
So tell us how superiorly China handled the spread of the Virus again, Duchess.
You're a perfect coverup puppet for the Chicoms.