@kevcvs57 saidNo, you are lying. Here is the proof.
No because you lied about Russian agents not hacking and releasing stuff from democrat servers so anything you say after that is null and void.
Was the recent Kremlin hack of US Government servers a lie too?
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/05/11/bombshell-crowdstrike-admits-no-evidence-russia-stole-emails-from-dnc-server/
There is no evidence Russia hacked the DNC.
@shavixmir said4 dislikes?
In my personal experience I would say that lower IQ people and people on the autistic scale (high functioning autism) tend to hold more extremist views.
Or at least tend to cling to singular, more simplistic, narratives.
Right-wing extremism is a simpler message to comprehend than left-wing extremism.
Although there does tend to be a left-wing extremist surge in se ...[text shortened]... e racist”.
Which, at their core, are actually simplistic right-wing tropes, covered in a new sauce.
Simpletons and autists obviously don’t like being called out!
Or is it that the extreme right doesn’t like the fact that their extremism is simpler to comprehend than left-wing extremism?
@shavixmir said“Some questions do not have simple answers, but some people do not understand complex answers. Therein lies a difficulty.”
In my personal experience I would say that lower IQ people and people on the autistic scale (high functioning autism) tend to hold more extremist views.
Or at least tend to cling to singular, more simplistic, narratives.
Right-wing extremism is a simpler message to comprehend than left-wing extremism.
Although there does tend to be a left-wing extremist surge in se ...[text shortened]... e racist”.
Which, at their core, are actually simplistic right-wing tropes, covered in a new sauce.
Goethe
@Duchess64 - Various independent investigations by the FBI or other US security agencies (which
include many Republicans in leadership) found that Russia DID intervene on
behalf of Donald Trump in the 2016 election.
Another pile of crappola.
A three year investigation by special investigator, Robert Mueller, arrived at NO SUCH FINDING.
At best Mueller showed that Russia stole the data, but in reality, investigators can only claim the servers
were breached by Russians, and that the data may have been taken by another party.
WikiLeaks proprietor, Julian Assange, claims that the Russians had nothing to do
with giving the data to him, as evidence that someone else was responsible for the data theft.
---------------
Now, show me where they conclude **with strong evidence** that the data theft
was done by **Russians colluding with Donald Trump**. Collusion has never
been established no matter how hard they tried to make the data fit.
In fact, Mueller said that no Russian in Moscow ever talked with anyone in Donald Trump's circle of associates.
So where's your proof, Duchess64, in "the Guardian"?
@metal-brain saidYour obviously a right wing extremist so there no point trying to talk sense to you.
No, you are lying. Here is the proof.
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/05/11/bombshell-crowdstrike-admits-no-evidence-russia-stole-emails-from-dnc-server/
There is no evidence Russia hacked the DNC.
I know your a liar and you know your lying so what’s the point.
@mghrn55 saidSo you dont think we lose liberty if Beto Orourk is appointed gun czar and effectually impacts, in ANY way, my owenership of a gun, or 10 guns?? (2nd amendment).
Do you do drip saliva on your keyboard when you are typing this drivel ?
Will you PLEASE answer this question from the artful drooler? Please?
@earl-of-trumps saidHa ha. You must like typing to yourself!!🤧🤣. Do you Really think a lib would relish guving you an answer?!?!
@Duchess64 - Various independent investigations by the FBI or other US security agencies (which
include many Republicans in leadership) found that Russia DID intervene on
behalf of Donald Trump in the 2016 election.
Another pile of crappola.
A three year investigation by special investigator, Robert Mueller, arrived at NO SUCH FINDING.
At best Mueller ...[text shortened]... one in Donald Trump's circle of associates.
So where's your proof, Duchess64, in "the Guardian"?
@kevcvs57 saidKev, if you, on the other hand, are a LEFT wing extremist, as in giving finger to constitution, is there a point in talking sende to you?
Your obviously a right wing extremist so there no point trying to talk sense to you.
I know your a liar and you know your lying so what’s the point.
@kevcvs57 saidI proved you to be a liar and I am proving it again.
Your obviously a right wing extremist so there no point trying to talk sense to you.
I know your a liar and you know your lying so what’s the point.
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/05/11/bombshell-crowdstrike-admits-no-evidence-russia-stole-emails-from-dnc-server/
Being wrong sucks, doesn't it?
@shavixmir saidNot to be redundant, I find it extreme that lefties endeavor 24/7 to get stuff owned by other people. You do.
4 dislikes?
Simpletons and autists obviously don’t like being called out!
Or is it that the extreme right doesn’t like the fact that their extremism is simpler to comprehend than left-wing extremism?
So, that is much more difficult to comprehend for the average man, or a man from Mars, than is the 'extremism' of the Right.
Yall just, dammit, bother people. We don't bother you.
It is that you think in terms of group life. Creepy. Can you walk down he street by yourself without a companion to help you make social decisions?
@averagejoe1 saidYour constitution is outdated and pathetic.
Kev, if you, on the other hand, are a LEFT wing extremist, as in giving finger to constitution, is there a point in talking sende to you?
And I’m not even an extremist.
@averagejoe1 saidNot really joe because your “query” was once again rambling and nonsensical, try rephrasing your query in a way that it is possible to grasp.
Kev, good morning. Can you respond to my query?