@moonbus saidJust because somebody was sanctioned does not make them guilty of anything.
Well, here it is, straight from the horse’s mouth, from the man who set it up and ran the operation. He says he did it in 2016, he’s still doing it, and he’ll continue doing it.
https://us.cnn.com/2023/02/14/europe/russia-yevgeny-prigozhin-internet-research-agency-intl
Mueller is a known scapegoat artist going on witch hunt after witch hunt. Ask Steven Hatfill.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-anthrax/u-s-settles-anthrax-lawsuit-with-scientist-idUKN2724774220080628
@metal-brain saidHey idiot he’s boasting about doing it!
Just because somebody was sanctioned does not make them guilty of anything.
Mueller is a known scapegoat artist going on witch hunt after witch hunt. Ask Steven Hatfill.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-anthrax/u-s-settles-anthrax-lawsuit-with-scientist-idUKN2724774220080628
You obviously are not in his personal loop, but then you only a bot.
@jj-adams said“ Prigozhin’s comments on Tuesday come several months after he admitted to interfering in the US democratic process and pledged to do so again, in what appeared to be the first admission of a high-level meddling campaign from someone close to the Kremlin.
CNN says page no longer exists.
Russian businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin attends the meeting with investors at the 2nd Eastern Economic Forum on September, 2, 2016 in Vladivostok, Russia.
Russian oligarch Yevgeny Prigozhin appears to admit to US election interference
“Gentlemen, we interfered, we interfere and we will interfere,” Prigozhin said in November, one day before the US midterm elections. “Carefully, precisely, surgically and in our own way, as we know how. During our pinpoint operations, we will remove both kidneys and the liver at once.”
Prigozhin is not a member of the Russian government, but has close ties to the president and has been dubbed “Vladimir Putin’s chef” after he began catering events for the Kremlin.”
From the link provided by moonbus I accessed it with no problem
@kevcvs57 saidmeanwhile soros openly and actively interferes for liberal democrats…where is your outrage?
“ Prigozhin’s comments on Tuesday come several months after he admitted to interfering in the US democratic process and pledged to do so again, in what appeared to be the first admission of a high-level meddling campaign from someone close to the Kremlin.
Russian businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin attends the meeting with investors at the 2nd Eastern Economic Forum on Septembe ...[text shortened]... n catering events for the Kremlin.”
From the link provided by moonbus I accessed it with no problem
@mott-the-hoople saidGive an example of your anti Jewish trope on legs interfering on behalf of the dems
meanwhile soros openly and actively interferes for liberal democrats…where is your outrage?
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidLol I didn’t need to read very far did I.
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/soros-throwing-money-to-tilt-2020-election-to-biden-democrats/
How dare he fund the campaign to enfranchise voters because people voting is the end of democracy isn’t it 🙄
I’ll ask again but make it clearer: any examples of Soros covertly and illegally trying to meddle in elections.
P.s Soros is a U.S. citizen so there’s that too.
There are plenty of corporate billionaire pigs setting up slush funds to disenfranchise US voters because they vote democrat, Soros on the other hand is clearly enabling democracy rather than trying to stifle it for partisan reasons. Can you grasp the difference.
@mott-the-hoople said
meanwhile soros openly and actively interferes for liberal democrats…where is your outrage?
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidIt's real simple:
meanwhile soros openly and actively interferes for liberal democrats…where is your outrage?
When a U.S. citizen tries to influence a U.S. campaign by posting his opinions to a web site or by contributing funds to a U.S. candidate, it's his right to do so.
When a foreigner posts outright lies and spreads conspiracy theories en mass, or contributes funds to a U.S. candidate, it's a crime.
Got that?