1. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    23 Sep '18 17:46
    Originally posted by @wolfe63
    So, you're basically admitting that you have no convictions at all.

    You're merely trying to provoke reader reaction. You're trying to satisfy a twisted compulsion: A feeling that "any attention, is good attention".

    This must be the emotional warmth, which life has long denied you.
    Why would I have convictions? What are you talking about? You make no sense.
  2. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142343
    23 Sep '18 20:04
    Originally posted by @mghrn55
    You believe God created Earth in 7 days.
    Who are you calling stupid ? 😛
    I am not a very religious person. Too many books written on it with differing opinions, and each swears it is the right one. My relationship with God is my business and mine alone...so fuk off!
  3. Joined
    06 Nov '15
    Moves
    41301
    23 Sep '18 20:431 edit
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    I am not a very religious person. Too many books written on it with differing opinions, and each swears it is the right one. My relationship with God is my business and mine alone...so fuk off!
    "My relationship with God is my business and mine alone...so fuk off!"

    Now...there's something we can agree upon! 🙂
  4. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Read a book!
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18677
    23 Sep '18 21:20
    Originally posted by @wolfe63
    "My relationship with God is my business and mine alone...so fuk off!"

    Now...there's something we can agree upon! 🙂
    Moople needs books that don't disagree.
  5. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142343
    24 Sep '18 00:46
    Originally posted by @handyandy
    Moople needs books that don't disagree.
    and little andy needs his man.
  6. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142343
    24 Sep '18 15:00
    Any bets?
  7. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    24 Sep '18 15:20
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    Any bets?
    Why would you want to hand money over? It's a done deal:

    After days of intense and closely watched legal wrangling, lawyers for the woman, Christine Blasey Ford, reached final agreement with committee representatives on Sunday for Dr. Blasey to testify. While several details — including whether Republicans will use an outside lawyer to question her — remain unsettled, a spokesman for the committee said its chairman, Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, considers the negotiations over, and Dr. Blasey’s lawyers said the hearing would go on no matter how those details are resolved.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/23/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-testify.html
  8. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142343
    24 Sep '18 15:32
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    Why would you want to hand money over? It's a done deal:

    After days of intense and closely watched legal wrangling, lawyers for the woman, Christine Blasey Ford, reached final agreement with committee representatives on Sunday for Dr. Blasey to testify. While several details — including whether Republicans will use an outside lawyer to question her — ...[text shortened]... ttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/23/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-testify.html
    "reached final agreement with committee"

    "While several details — including whether Republicans will use an outside lawyer to question her — remain unsettled,"

    Undoubtedly you don't understand the word "final"

    Taking bets!
  9. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    24 Sep '18 15:44
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    "reached final agreement with committee"

    "While several details — including whether Republicans will use an outside lawyer to question her — remain unsettled,"

    Undoubtedly you don't understand the word "final"

    Taking bets!
    Apparently you don't understand English:

    Dr. Blasey’s lawyers said the hearing would go on no matter how those details are resolved.
  10. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    24 Sep '18 18:31
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    Any bets?
    I suppose there is one possible way Blasey Ford won't testify; if the Kavanaugh nomination is withdrawn before Thursday.

    I'm thinking that's about a 50-50 thingy right now.
  11. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142343
    24 Sep '18 18:37
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    I suppose there is one possible way Blasey Ford won't testify; if the Kavanaugh nomination is withdrawn before Thursday.

    I'm thinking that's about a 50-50 thingy right now.
    undoubtedly you don't know about the letter he sent to grassy/Feinstein today, do try to keep up.
  12. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142343
    24 Sep '18 18:381 edit
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    Apparently you don't understand English:

    Dr. Blasey’s lawyers said the hearing would go on no matter how those details are resolved.
    there will not be any testimony from her.
  13. Subscribershavixmir
    Guppy poo
    Sewers of Holland
    Joined
    31 Jan '04
    Moves
    87824
    24 Sep '18 20:05
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    there will not be any testimony from her.
    You’re going to assasinate her?

    Or did you look into your plastic 8-ball and predict the future?
  14. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142343
    25 Sep '18 17:25
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    I suppose there is one possible way Blasey Ford won't testify; if the Kavanaugh nomination is withdrawn before Thursday.

    I'm thinking that's about a 50-50 thingy right now.
    She never intended to...

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/25/kavanaugh-hearing-once-again-in-doubt-as-christine-ford-raises-new-concerns.html
  15. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    25 Sep '18 17:32
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    She never intended to...

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/25/kavanaugh-hearing-once-again-in-doubt-as-christine-ford-raises-new-concerns.html
    With the third accuser/witness combo from Avenatti, this may be a moot point.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree