Originally posted by petrosianpupilAh... More proof of the uselessness of IQ tests.
Looks like dimjim and the supreme Dimlard are not that unusual. The US does not do too well on IQ tests.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_IQ#National_IQ_estimates
What scares me is the countries that score in the 60's.
Originally posted by petrosianpupilI'm not surprised you're sporting a woody over this book since its central premise is "the ethical responsibility of rich, high-IQ nations to financially assist poor, low-IQ nations, as it is the responsibility of rich citizens to assist the poor" -- socialism by any other name. You should instead look for a book that measures the correlation between poverty and the percentage of citizens who suck on the government teat for their sustenance.
Looks like dimjim and the supreme Dimlard are not that unusual. The US does not do too well on IQ tests.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_IQ#National_IQ_estimates
What scares me is the countries that score in the 60's.
Originally posted by petrosianpupilThe only thing IQ tests are good at is measuring the ability to take IQ tests.
Looks like dimjim and the supreme Dimlard are not that unusual. The US does not do too well on IQ tests.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_IQ#National_IQ_estimates
What scares me is the countries that score in the 60's.
Originally posted by petrosianpupilWell, I don't believe the results... some of the countries scored over 100%
Looks like dimjim and the supreme Dimlard are not that unusual. The US does not do too well on IQ tests.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_IQ#National_IQ_estimates
What scares me is the countries that score in the 60's.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterAgain you make up views I do not have.
I'm not surprised you're sporting a woody over this book since its central premise is "the ethical responsibility of rich, high-IQ nations to financially assist poor, low-IQ nations, as it is the responsibility of rich citizens to assist the poor" -- socialism by any other name. You should instead look for a book that measures the correlation be ...[text shortened]... poverty and the percentage of citizens who suck on the government teat for their sustenance.
Enabling people to have access (and freedom) to work for themselves is not socialism, it is free market capitalism.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterYou talk an incredible amount of bollocks.
You should instead look for a book that measures the correlation between poverty and the percentage of citizens who suck on the government teat for their sustenance.
All that would prove is that some States have better poverty nets than others... nothing to do with IQ. What-so-bloody-ever.
Originally posted by shavixmirSo you're saying you believe that the IQs of people who people who work for a living are the same as those who sit around all day and collect benefits?
You talk an incredible amount of bollocks.
All that would prove is that some States have better poverty nets than others... nothing to do with IQ. What-so-bloody-ever.