States losing the largest number of wealthy people.

@AThousandYoung said
I alerted them?

Since when did those people listen to ME?

You fall into a conservative trap. I said that you alerted them… I did not say that they heard you..
You are really gonna have to pick it up. You can come with us or go with that guy with boy in his name.

@AverageJoe1 said
I did not know it was that complicated, that one has to ferrett out all the whys and wherefores.
Hey the wealthy are leaving so lib parasites cannot get their money. That is all it is. You want to write about how they got wealthy, Not even Suzianne will know what you are talking abut. Mine is a whole lot easier to understand, but, what's new

I actually learned ...[text shortened]... bate student when he was challenged in a debate. He proved that it was not . Made perfect sense!!!

It's not complicated at all. Blue states have much higher GDP per person, they run more efficient economies. The reason is leadership.

Blue states produce things and produce wealthy people. Red states create tax shelters for the wealthy people.

@wildgrass said
It's not complicated at all. Blue states have much higher GDP per person, they run more efficient economies. The reason is leadership.

Blue states produce things and produce wealthy people. Red states create tax shelters for the wealthy people.

Prob all true, not a detail man myself and I sure don;'t research on the forum. But this OP, see above is that the wealthy are fleeing states, the top five beinmg all blue states.
Can you not POSSIBLY comment on that, instead of changing the subject to the nature of the money that they are fleeing with ? Newsome wants this money for CA. Hochel is BEGGING the rich to come back to NYC.
That That That is the issue, Mr Liberal. There are rich peoploe in FL too, but they dont flee.
You libs just cannot face up to a thread like a man. It aint in you.

@AverageJoe1 said
Prob all true, not a detail man myself and I sure don;'t research on the forum. But this OP, see above is that the wealthy are fleeing states, the top five beinmg all blue states.
Can you not POSSIBLY comment on that, instead of changing the subject to the nature of the money that they are fleeing with ? Newsome wants this money for CA. Hochel is BEGGING the rich ...[text shortened]... L too, but they dont flee.
You libs just cannot face up to a thread like a man. It aint in you.

Maybe an analogy would help limit the number of details.

On the left you have a factory that produces beach umbrellas. On the right you have a beach. You see the umbrellas "fleeing" the factory and headed to the beach and you think "Man, there must be something wrong with that factory."

Weird logic.

@wildgrass said
It's not complicated at all. Blue states have much higher GDP per person, they run more efficient economies. The reason is leadership.

Blue states produce things and produce wealthy people. Red states create tax shelters for the wealthy people.

It also cost around 35% more to live in California and break even. Texas is the second gdp around three trillion and California four, with Texas as the fastest growing state and could catch California within 10 years. Massive fraud being found in California?

What is the increased gdp percentage per person of people in California over Texans?

How about freedom of citizens not restricted by nutjobs?

@mike69 said
It also cost around 35% more to live in California and break even. Texas is the second gdp around three trillion and California four, with Texas as the fastest growing state and could catch California within 10 years. Massive fraud being found in California?

What is the increased gdp percentage per person of people in California over Texans?

How about freedom of citizens not restricted by nutjobs?

Yeah I get that there are other considerations, but Joe wanted things as simple as possible so that's what he got.

In terms of cost of living, good point. The math works out a lot different for the wealthy compared to the middle class. For the wealthy, taxes are a huge component of the calculation, so moving their primary residence to Florida makes sense. But for the middle class, they prefer the high paying jobs, innovation and vibrant economic growth that can be found in the blue states, even if cost of living is slightly higher.

For you, I think you don't like men with long hair, so maybe stay out of San Francisco.

p.s. Texas is second because of population. If you correct for per capita GDP, they're like 15th.

@wildgrass said
Yeah I get that there are other considerations, but Joe wanted things as simple as possible so that's what he got.

In terms of cost of living, good point. The math works out a lot different for the wealthy compared to the middle class. For the wealthy, taxes are a huge component of the calculation, so moving their primary residence to Florida makes sense. But for the mid ...[text shortened]...

p.s. Texas is second because of population. If you correct for per capita GDP, they're like 15th.

Your pathetic🤣

@wildgrass said
Maybe an analogy would help limit the number of details.

On the left you have a factory that produces beach umbrellas. On the right you have a beach. You see the umbrellas "fleeing" the factory and headed to the beach and you think "Man, there must be something wrong with that factory."

Weird logic.

Yes, weird. Let's pretend that you did jot write it and we will also pretend that we do not understand it. (You THINK?)
See if you can roil up a response to my post?



🤔 🤔 umbrellas flee thhhee faaactory......

@AverageJoe1 said
These are YOUR states. The states they are running away to, listed at the bottom, are MY states. I think that wraps this thread up , no need to respond, just being a bit informative.

States Losing High-Income Earners
California: The state with the highest personal income tax (13.3😵 has seen massive outflows, with over 307,000 net residents and billions in adjusted ...[text shortened]... ifornia continued their streak as the nation's biggest losers of residents and their wealth to ot...

Florida, Texas, Arizona, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
Looks like the new beginning of another Confederacy, huh smaller than average joe boy? 😆

@wildgrass said
Yeah I get that there are other considerations, but Joe wanted things as simple as possible so that's what he got.

In terms of cost of living, good point. The math works out a lot different for the wealthy compared to the middle class. For the wealthy, taxes are a huge component of the calculation, so moving their primary residence to Florida makes sense. But for the mid ...[text shortened]...

p.s. Texas is second because of population. If you correct for per capita GDP, they're like 15th.

Y’all are so funny… Dancing around why the wealthy are leaving those states. You see, the states want their money. Well that wraps up this post.
And it is so funny that you think that your silly umbrella diatribe is sort of an analogy, which is certainly was not …. the inert umbrellas went to the beach, yeah I just didn’t get that. .

@KingDavid403 said
Florida, Texas, Arizona, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
Looks like the new beginning of another Confederacy, huh smaller than average joe boy? 😆

No, it doesn’t.

@AThousandYoung said
By the way we do enjoy Miley Cyrus, LeBron James and his son here in CA. Michael Franceze is another wealthy individual who chose to live here.

Who are these rich people who are leaving and why should I care again?

We have Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex in CA too. He was smitten with one of our light skinned Black actresses and he married her and moved here to CA. Arnold Schwartzenegger came here too.

You know, rich white European immigrants, like Trump keeps begging for. They don't go to red States.

@AverageJoe1 said
Prob all true, not a detail man myself and I sure don;'t research on the forum.

So, you just spout your opinion without anything to back it up???

@AverageJoe1 said
Y’all are so funny… Dancing around why the wealthy are leaving those states. You see, the states want their money. Well that wraps up this post.
And it is so funny that you think that your silly umbrella diatribe is sort of an analogy, which is certainly was not …. the inert umbrellas went to the beach, yeah I just didn’t get that. .

For the last time, the wealth was created in states with environments that support more efficient and faster economic development.

@mike69 said
It also cost around 35% more to live in California and break even. Texas is the second gdp around three trillion and California four, with Texas as the fastest growing state and could catch California within 10 years. Massive fraud being found in California?

What is the increased gdp percentage per person of people in California over Texans?

How about freedom of citizens not restricted by nutjobs?

CA's per capita GDP a little over $100,000, Texas closer to $90,000. Both had equal growth rates as of 2024.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_GDP

Where are you getting your data about growth? What about your fraud sources?

Anyway your side just elected a 34x fraud to the Presidency. NOW you care about fraud?