Go back
Structured Debate.

Structured Debate.

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I was just wondering what other fellow users of the RHP 'Debate' forum think of having more structured debates on the most heated of current affairs. By structured debate, I mean formal debate, with specified debaters (in teams or on their own), taking up a motion, and arguing it to the best of their abilities, regardless of personal opinion.

I, myself, can't see a better way to insert more factual knowledge into this forum, while eradicating all petty, personal, and, quite frankly, useless comments.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Im for that

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HumeA
I was just wondering what other fellow users of the RHP 'Debate' forum think of having more structured debates on the most heated of current affairs. By structured debate, I mean formal debate, with specified debaters (in teams or on their own), taking up a motion, and arguing it to the best of their abilities, regardless of personal opinion.

I, myself, can ...[text shortened]... into this forum, while eradicating all petty, personal, and, quite frankly, useless comments.
Okay, you do that. You try and organize teams from this place. Make sure and let me know how it works out, okay? =D

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HumeA
I was just wondering what other fellow users of the RHP 'Debate' forum think of having more structured debates on the most heated of current affairs. By structured debate, I mean formal debate, with specified debaters (in teams or on their own), taking up a motion, and arguing it to the best of their abilities, regardless of personal opinion.

I, myself, can ...[text shortened]... into this forum, while eradicating all petty, personal, and, quite frankly, useless comments.
It doesn't work very well. The judges around here are completely incompetant.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I agree with all that, with the caveat that I would like the specified team of debaters to go and take a running jump into the nearest volcano.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

If everyone just followed my style of debating, we could get somewhere....😀

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Let's debate that bolstering and complying with a multinational organisation like the UN is critical to the future of humans.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
Let's debate that bolstering and complying with a multinational organisation like the UN is critical to the future of humans.
The UN?....is that the United Nothings?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chancremechanic
The UN?....is that the United Nothings?
You might regard it as UN-American.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
You might regard it as UN-American.
Damn...we agree on something!!! Miracles do happen!

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

What do you think's a good subject for a structured debate and do you think it could be done without people posting "trash" into the thread ?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sambo69
What do you think's a good subject for a structured debate and do you think it could be done without people posting "trash" into the thread ?
I don't know, as I've been accused, wrongly of course 😏, of adding my own trash-talk to the forums. Any thing will do, but trash will be thrown. Ask youself this: How many political commercials actually talk about what the politician proposes to do to improve society?...mostly it is mud-slinging, and voters are left wondering what the issues are...from councilman of a small town to President of the USA...it's ridiculous

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chancremechanic
I don't know, as I've been accused, wrongly of course 😏, of adding my own trash-talk to the forums. Any thing will do, but trash will be thrown. Ask youself this: How many political commercials actually talk about what the politician proposes to do to improve society?...mostly it is mud-slinging, and voters are left wondering what the issues are...from councilman of a small town to President of the USA...it's ridiculous
We agree yet again but is that what you're proposing for debate ?

Clock
6 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chancremechanic
I don't know, as I've been accused, wrongly of course 😏, of adding my own trash-talk to the forums. Any thing will do, but trash will be thrown. Ask youself this: How many political commercials actually talk about what the politician proposes to do to improve society?...mostly it is mud-slinging, and voters are left wondering what the issues are...from councilman of a small town to President of the USA...it's ridiculous
i agree with you ... most of the political circus that makes our countries do what they do, sending their militaries where they go etc, is simply ridiculous mudslinging much like 2 yearolds at child care having fun.

the question in this thread is ... should we try something more accurate? should we actually detach the issue of what the country should do from the politician's vulnerabilities in their careers.

be careful ... this is a very deep blow at the base of democracy ... it proposes government decisions be related to the consequences of the action involved with their decision ... at present the country's actions relate more to the current democratic leader's concerns with the effect of the paparazzi on their lifestyle.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.