@KingDavid403 said? Trump?
And the price for 18 eggs is down from $8.64 to $3.97 in my neck of the woods.
I was paying $1.80 a dozen until your worthless to God false god took office. Still way over a 100% increase. Furthermore, everything else has gone up in price liar.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidHow do you care to write about another country when when you are a United States citizen …..just curious, and comparing them is boring, as there is no comparison.
Sounds like his position is a helluva lot more than ceremonial:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_the_Netherlands
Take Canada today. Trump shuts down trade talks. That means Trump is the boss of Canada. So why talk about the losing side in such a losing skirmish? I’d rather talk about the USA. Did you see where SCOTUS is about to turn the corner? All of the proper judges ruled properly today. The other pitiful, uneducated little ladies on SCOTUS were brushed aside. Amy Barrett, who wrote the opinion, was brilliant and she was right. That is the hard part for you little fellas …our side was right.
@shavixmir saidThis one wants us to delve into 100yrs of history. . Pitiful. I like Today. Have you seen the news today? SCOTUS and the president have kicked ass. District court judges have been overruled. Trump did that. Thank God. And thank God for Trump.
Uhuh.
Perhaps read up on the 1930’s.
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@AverageJoe1 saidBecause he was making a big deal out of King Trump being an autocrat/tyrant etc and I thought it was odd coming from someone who has a King as the official head of his own government. Plus he's just a doosh and I figured it would rile him.
How do you care to write about another country when when you are a United States citizen …..just curious, and comparing them is boring, as there is no comparison.
Take Canada today. Trump shuts down trade talks. That means Trump is the boss of Canada. So why talk about the losing side in such a losing skirmish? I’d rather talk about the USA. Did you see where SCOTUS ...[text shortened]... n, was brilliant and she was right. That is the hard part for you little fellas …our side was right.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidDo these turkeys realize that they cannot use the courts anymore>. No weaponaization of the law? No, they do not. They want to write about eggs and something in 1930, see above.
Because he was making a big deal out of King Trump being an autocrat/tyrant etc and I thought it was odd coming from someone who has a King as the official head of his own government. Plus he's just a doosh and I figured it would rile him.
ALL they have left is class actions, oh boy. And, oh lord, say it aint so, they also have RIOTS!!! They are like animals. The hyena approach.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou WANT the slippery slope to dictatorship. You forget the forefathers framed THREE separate but equal branches of government and when one branch goes bananas like Trump with his secret police, masked thugs arresting even US citizens, THAT IS BY DEFINITION BANANAS, LITERALLY the stuff of banana republics and when one branch sees that they are BOUND by law to stop the excesses of a rouge POTUS.
This one wants to limit the powers, the constitutional powers, of the President of the United States. So do all of the district judges. What a mire that you are all caught up in.
A POTUS as a CONVICTED felon and we are supposed to just stand aside and let him get deeper and deeper to full blown dictatorship.
THAT IS WHAT IS GOING ON HERE but you are ALL blind to it.
@AverageJoe1 saidAre you high?
Do these turkeys realize that they cannot use the courts anymore>. No weaponaization of the law? No, they do not. They want to write about eggs and something in 1930, see above.
ALL they have left is class actions, oh boy. And, oh lord, say it aint so, they also have RIOTS!!! They are like animals. The hyena approach.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidI remember when integrity used to be "a thing" in this country.
Because he was making a big deal out of King Trump being an autocrat/tyrant etc and I thought it was odd coming from someone who has a King as the official head of his own government. Plus he's just a doosh and I figured it would rile him.
Now it's all about the cult of personality.
@AverageJoe1 saidOne step closer to a monarchy.
This one wants us to delve into 100yrs of history. . Pitiful. I like Today. Have you seen the news today? SCOTUS and the president have kicked ass. District court judges have been overruled. Trump did that. Thank God. And thank God for Trump.
@AverageJoe1 saidExcept you're not. Not by any measure.
How do you care to write about another country when when you are a United States citizen …..just curious, and comparing them is boring, as there is no comparison.
Take Canada today. Trump shuts down trade talks. That means Trump is the boss of Canada. So why talk about the losing side in such a losing skirmish? I’d rather talk about the USA. Did you see where SCOTUS ...[text shortened]... n, was brilliant and she was right. That is the hard part for you little fellas …our side was right.
@shavixmir said5 years? Believe me, the people who have a brain aren't happy now.
Yes. It would seem kind of worrying to all normal people.
But, you know, the slippery slide into autocracy is slippery. And slidy.
What’s happening in the US is so blatant, it’s being encouraged.
And that is what’s truly terrifying.
Many Americans support the autocratic/ dictatorship stance of trump.
There seems to be a complete lack of rationality or historic ...[text shortened]... apart is only going to serve as a notice that they should have been there in the first bloody place!
@Sleepyguy saidFunny, the SCOTUS never intervened when:
I stole the thread title from Bablylon Bee
Heh
But seriously:
[quote]
On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case that challenged the use of sweeping nationwide injunctions to block federal policy. The ruling significantly curtails the ability of lower courts to issue broad orders that halt executive actions across the country, ...[text shortened]... to-activist-judges-using-nationwide-injunctions
Nice to have separation of powers back, eh folks?
"In Biden’s first three years as president, every single one of 14 nationwide injunctions, on topics ranging from halting vaccine mandates to immigration and climate change policies, was issued by a judge appointed by a Republican president."
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/injunction-junction
"Separation of powers" seems to be a right wing codeword here for allowing Trump to do blatantly illegal and/or unconstitutional actions while appellate courts twiddle their thumbs.
From Sotomayor's dissent:
"this Court endorses the radical proposition that the
President is harmed, irreparably, whenever he cannot do
something he wants to do, even if what he wants to do is
break the law. "
at p. 16 of her her opinion, 69 of 119 here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf
The majority explicitly decline to even take up the issue as to whether Trump's harebrained theory denying birthright citizenship is constitutional mainly because precedent and history make clear it is not.
@AverageJoe1 saidUhuh. Just over-ride the elected parliament.
This one wants us to delve into 100yrs of history. . Pitiful. I like Today. Have you seen the news today? SCOTUS and the president have kicked ass. District court judges have been overruled. Trump did that. Thank God. And thank God for Trump.