Switching to blockade was kinda genius

@wildgrass said
It's a weird comparison but free college would be a much better use of tax dollars than a naval blockade.

Depends on the nature of the blockade, wild grass. This is a great example of liberal do not close their post..
And I always find it strange that you think that the govt paying off the loans of people who borrow money for whatever reason would be ‘better’ than anything. I cannot think of a thing that it would be better than.. If you want to be helpful, tell us what would be better than spending it on tuition… Maybe raising pitiful three- child single mothers out of poverty?
Do you remember when Marauder was saying that paying those loans (he said ‘forgiving’ in there instead of paying), did not cost the govr? ? but it did not get by average joe.

@AverageJoe1 said
Depends on the nature of the blockade, wild grass. This is a great example of liberal do not close their post..
And I always find it strange that you think that the govt paying off the loans of people who borrow money for whatever reason would be ‘better’ than anything. I cannot think of a thing that it would be better than.. If you want to be helpful, tell us what ...[text shortened]... forgiving’ in there instead of paying), did not cost the govr? ? but it did not get by average joe.

You made the comparison not me. Billions will be spent on a blockade that achieves nothing except higher gas prices, but at least a loan forgiveness program would put a few extra dollars back into American pockets.

@AverageJoe1 said
This looney tune just wrote that Iran is ‘bound by’ a nuclear agreement !!!! Comprehensive at that!!!

Does anyone want to tackle this one?

Gonna be another one of those days. Unbelievable. Marauder is on atopic that, in effect, is saying there should be no countries, no borders, no anything, everybody just wander around on the natural earth or whatever he calls ...[text shortened]... could really screw up that ‘society’ …….he has voiced no solution to that. Maybe no bad dudes??

Are you suggest there wasn’t a nuclear deal with Iran that was being monitored by the internarional atomic agency?

Your limp cock caused your testiclettes to block your brain with greasy, unused smega.

You complete and utter moron.

@AverageJoe1 said
Depends on the nature of the blockade, wild grass. This is a great example of liberal do not close their post..
And I always find it strange that you think that the govt paying off the loans of people who borrow money for whatever reason would be ‘better’ than anything. I cannot think of a thing that it would be better than.. If you want to be helpful, tell us what ...[text shortened]... forgiving’ in there instead of paying), did not cost the govr? ? but it did not get by average joe.

I said forgiving because that is accurate since the government is owed the money ( as explained to you here probably a hundred times).

@shavixmir said
Are you suggest there wasn’t a nuclear deal with Iran that was being monitored by the internarional atomic agency?

Your limp cock caused your testiclettes to block your brain with greasy, unused smega.

You complete and utter moron.

You are a foul-mouthed perverted dunce. Try to do your research instead of blindly supporting these murderous Islamic animals. These Islamic barbarians who kill thousands of their own with primitive weapons have no right to have nukes that can kill millions.

From CoPilot:
Q: In the last 25 years, how well did Iran abide by their agreement with IAEA regarding nuclear weapons development?

A: Below is a balanced, evidence‑based assessment of how well Iran has abided by its agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) over roughly the last 25 years (≈2000–2025), drawing directly from IAEA findings, UN documents, and independent technical analyses.

Executive Summary - Iran’s compliance with the IAEA has been uneven and cyclical rather than consistent.

Early 2000s: Iran was found in non‑compliance, having conducted undeclared nuclear activities relevant to weapons development.
2006–2015: Persistent disputes, sanctions, and limited cooperation.
2016–2018 (JCPOA period): High compliance and unprecedented transparency, verified repeatedly by the IAEA.
2019–present: Growing non‑compliance, reduced inspector access, unresolved safeguards violations, and enrichment far beyond civilian needs.
The IAEA today cannot provide assurance that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusively peaceful, primarily due to missing declarations, restricted access, and unresolved questions about past weapons‑related work.

1. 2000–2005: Discovery of Undeclared Nuclear Activities
In 2002, previously secret facilities at Natanz (uranium enrichment) and Arak (heavy water reactor) were revealed. Subsequent inspections showed:
Iran had failed to declare nuclear materials and activities, violating its safeguards obligations.
In September 2005, the IAEA Board of Governors formally found Iran in non‑compliance with its safeguards agreement.
Iran temporarily increased cooperation in late 2003, including voluntary suspension of enrichment, but this collapsed by 2005.

2. 2006–2015: Limited Cooperation Under Sanctions
From 2006–2010, the UN Security Council adopted multiple resolutions requiring Iran to:
Suspend enrichment
Cooperate fully with the IAEA
Ratify and implement the Additional Protocol
Iran did not comply with most of these binding resolutions, continued enrichment, and built Fordow, a covert underground facility revealed in 2009.
The IAEA continued to investigate Iran’s “possible military dimensions” (PMD), including weapons‑relevant research under the Amad Plan in the early 2000s.
congress

3. 2016–2018: Full Compliance Under the JCPOA
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) marked the most compliant period in Iran‑IAEA relations.
The IAEA verified that Iran:
Removed over 13,000 centrifuges
Reduced enriched uranium stockpile by 98%
Capped enrichment at 3.67%
Gave the IAEA unprecedented access, including continuous monitoring
Iran was certified compliant in every IAEA report from January 2016 until the U.S. withdrawal in May 2018.

4. 2019–2022: Gradual Breakdown of Compliance
After the U.S. exited the JCPOA:
Iran began exceeding enrichment limits
Installed advanced centrifuges
Increased enrichment first to 20%, then 60%
Reduced IAEA access and disabled monitoring equipment
By February 2021, Iran stopped implementing JCPOA‑specific transparency measures, causing the IAEA to lose “continuity of knowledge” about key activities.

5. 2023–2025: Renewed Findings of Non‑Compliance
In 2024–2025, the situation deteriorated further:

The IAEA concluded Iran failed to explain undeclared nuclear material at multiple sites (Lavisan‑Shian, Varamin, Marivan, Turquzabad).
Evidence linked these sites to a structured, undeclared nuclear weapons program in the early 2000s.
Iran refused access, sanitized sites, de‑designated inspectors, and provided inconsistent explanations.
In June 2025, the IAEA Board of Governors again found Iran in non‑compliance with its safeguards agreement.

@Rajk999 said
You are a foul-mouthed perverted dunce. Try to do your research instead of blindly supporting these murderous Islamic animals. These Islamic barbarians who kill thousands of their own with primitive weapons have no right to have nukes that can kill millions.

From CoPilot:
Q: In the last 25 years, how well did Iran abide by their agreement with IAEA regarding nuclear we ...[text shortened]... 2025, the IAEA Board of Governors again found Iran in non‑compliance with its safeguards agreement.

This part, Raj.

Iran was certified compliant in every IAEA report from January 2016 until the U.S. withdrawal in May 2018.

We had a deal. It was working. Trump ripped it up. Then things got worse.

@shavixmir said
Are you suggest there wasn’t a nuclear deal with Iran that was being monitored by the internarional atomic agency?

Your limp cock caused your testiclettes to block your brain with greasy, unused smega.

You complete and utter moron.

But, but, the news constantly points out that they are totally untrustworthy and would violate any agreement ever put before them, being monitored or not. They might strangle the man that is monitoring them? Of course. They are heathens and savages.
Heathens and savages. They will honor nothing. They would kill their mother. What is wrong with you people . Iran lovers with TDS. Happy life!!! , that is what’s wrong with you.

No matter, no discussion needed….. We will have them wrapped up in due course.
Wish I could tell you boys what investment I just loaded up with. When the dam breaks, I think I’ll go pick some tulips in Netherlands, but I will tell my pilot to keep the engine running.

@AverageJoe1 said
But, but, the news constantly points out that they are totally untrustworthy and would violate any agreement ever put before them, being monitored or not. They might strangle the man that is monitoring them? Of course. They are heathens and savages.
Heathens and savages. They will honor nothing. They would kill their mother. What is wrong with you people . Iran l ...[text shortened]... think I’ll go pick some tulips in Netherlands, but I will tell my pilot to keep the engine running.

“The” are untrustworthy?
Who started the war whilst negotiations were commencing?

And you dare call the other party untrustworthy?

The stars and stripes are seemingly shoved so far up yours that when you burb the stench of anal rot floats around the flag as it waves in the wind gasping wind.

@Rajk999 said
You are a foul-mouthed perverted dunce. Try to do your research instead of blindly supporting these murderous Islamic animals. These Islamic barbarians who kill thousands of their own with primitive weapons have no right to have nukes that can kill millions.

From CoPilot:
Q: In the last 25 years, how well did Iran abide by their agreement with IAEA regarding nuclear we ...[text shortened]... 2025, the IAEA Board of Governors again found Iran in non‑compliance with its safeguards agreement.

And you are snowflake of a retarded trailer track whore. Probably got it from your mum.

You say: Do your research.
And then admit your own research is using a language bot.

For fvck’s sake. You are so ridiculous… and a nazi to boot, I’m putting you on the ignore list again. Damn, just reading your posts is like licking your mum’s male-whore’s arse.

@Rajk999 said
2016–2018 (JCPOA period): High compliance and unprecedented transparency, verified repeatedly by the IAEA.
2019–present: Growing non‑compliance, reduced inspector access, unresolved safeguards violations, and enrichment far beyond civilian needs.

This is all we need to know.

In May of 2018, Trump pulling the US out of JCPOA unilaterally resulted in flashing Iran the big green light to go back to "business as usual." Trump knew this would happen, and did it with the express reason of wanting to go to war with Iran. The JCPOA was working, but with it in place, working as intended, Trump couldn't invent a reason to go after Iran.

Trump didn't give a damn about nuclear weapons, he just wanted an excuse to "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran". I'm sure he fantasized about using nukes himself.

Biden tried to restart the program, but by then, Iran was tired of all the US lies.

@shavixmir said
“The” are untrustworthy?
Who started the war whilst negotiations were commencing?

And you dare call the other party untrustworthy?

The stars and stripes are seemingly shoved so far up yours that when you burb the stench of anal rot floats around the flag as it waves in the wind gasping wind.

You boys are really stretching for any morsel to make your 'points'(?)

Google who began this conflict which has erupted into a war. Hint, 47 years ago... and over 1000 Americans murdered (one of the fave words of you libs, used properly for a change.)....and killing 240 soldiers in their beds. And other stuff that we just decided not to take anymore. Trump decided, not his pussy predecessors.

Long Live Trump. Y'all can't seem to eliminate him. God, your TDS smells to high heaven.

@wildgrass said
This part, Raj.

Iran was certified compliant in every IAEA report from January 2016 until the U.S. withdrawal in May 2018.

We had a deal. It was working. Trump ripped it up. Then things got worse.

Iran had the IAEA and the rest of the gullible world fooled. Iran pretended to comply with the JCPOA because of the benefits, the cash refunds and the sanctions which totalled hundreds of Billlions$$$. Prior to that they were stockpiling weapons grade uranium and hiding it in underground facilities which nobody could find. Here is what Google says.

******************************
Prior to the 2015 JCPOA, Iran was generally not in full compliance with IAEA requirements regarding its nuclear program and weaponization development. The IAEA found Iran conducted coordinated activities relevant to developing a nuclear device before 2003, with some continuing until 2009, including failure to declare facilities and restricting inspector access.
Key details of pre-JCPOA compliance include:
- Undisclosed Activities: For years, Iran failed to report nuclear-related activities to the IAEA, which notes violated its comprehensive safeguards agreement, including activities identified after October 2003.
- Weaponization Research: A December 2015 IAEA report (covering the period leading up to the JCPOA) determined that a range of activities relevant to developing a nuclear explosive device were conducted in Iran prior to the end of 2003, with some continuing until 2009.
- Restricted Access: Iran often restricted inspector access to sites and failed to provide information, prompting several IAEA Board of Governors investigations into "possible military dimensions" (PMDs) of its program.
- Transparency Gaps: While Iran signed the Additional Protocol in 2003, it did not ratify it, and it continued to restrict inspector access to key sites, such as the Arak reactor, until 2009.

While Iran complied with an interim "Joint Plan of Action" in 2013 leading up to the final deal, its overall conduct prior to the 2015 JCPOA was marked by significant discrepancies with IAEA monitoring, only addressing many of these concerns just before the deal's implementation.

***************************************

@Rajk999 said
Iran had the IAEA and the rest of the gullible world fooled. Iran pretended to comply with the JCPOA because of the benefits, the cash refunds and the sanctions which totalled hundreds of Billlions$$$. Prior to that they were stockpiling weapons grade uranium and hiding it in underground facilities which nobody could find. Here is what Google says.

********************* ...[text shortened]... of these concerns just before the deal's implementation.

***************************************

Why are you avoiding the relevant period of time when JPCOA was in place, between 2016 and 2018?

The benefits, cash and lifted sanctions were working to limit nuclear proliferation. Trump ripped up the deal that was fixing all the issues you are describing that took place before. Why would Iran ever trust the USA again by signing a new deal?

@AverageJoe1 said
No. I think you must be new, I have with my humor vein injected that in several areas when you folks go off the rails. It is the way I was saying that you are off the rails, and I am here of my own volition to help.
I cannot imagine you would be that naïve.
No, I’m not paid, but I am humbled that you give me such credit. I LIED!!!!! oops, more humor. You may hav ...[text shortened]... r sure, sitcoms etc. but you do not understand humor and you do not exhibit any humor in your posts.

So; you admit you lie and joke in serious forums like the dates forums.

Man, you are a waste of space.

I hereby rename you BelowAverageJoe

@wildgrass said
Why are you avoiding the relevant period of time when JPCOA was in place, between 2016 and 2018?

The benefits, cash and lifted sanctions were working to limit nuclear proliferation. Trump ripped up the deal that was fixing all the issues you are describing that took place before. Why would Iran ever trust the USA again by signing a new deal?

There is no such thing as any 'relevant period'. People have to be judged by their history. Iran has a long history of IAEA violations going back 25 years.

Nobody in their right mind trust Muslims, especially those who are extremists and who finance terrorism.

You are insane to believe that anything was working with JCPOA, when Iran was hiding and stockpiling uranium and building nuclear facilities underground.